Pierre Poilievre ist zum zweiten Mal in Folge „Canadian Press Newsmaker of the Year“.

But… he functionally did nothing all year? I get he is official opposition but he didn’t even accomplish that. Liberals have been effectively taking themselves down and all he’s had to do is call for resignation all year… which he does every year multiple times. It is his job to question the government sure but the house was already in fire and not due to anything he did.

Like it or not, looks like he is our next prime minister.

Trudeau made more news this year, for better or for worse

He spews slogans and bull shit, the media loves that. Trump is person of the year so bull shitters are popular.

The mainstream media in Canada is so unbelievably biased against Trudeau and yet people in this sub still call it left wing.

They left out a word.

They mean just another Pierre **COVER** **UP**. A paint job.

We need journalists who **UNCOVER.**

More evidence we live in a boring country.

“Man says a lot of things” – Canadian Press: “he’s a newsmaker!!!!”

Mark my words. He will be making headlines for the next four years. For all the wrong reasons

The Canadian press has made this happen, not just by choosing him. All year we hear of his endless complaints yet rarely do we see articles holding him to account by asking what detailed policies he would institute to change things. They have lifted him deliberately, this is shameful.

Well, right wing media is the lobbying firm of right wing politicians in Canada… and most media is either centrist or right wing in Canada that’s why you never hear the other parties.

He should thank Justin Trudeau for making him relevant

How can you tell the news is bought and paid for .

Pp did nothing but whine and make political fumbles all year

Canada sucks everything is horrible only I can make everything better.

Who owns CP?

Did they mean noise maker? That would be more accurate.

How?

Apparently you become newsmaker of the year for accomplishing nothing over the course of 20 years.

The fix is in.

And he hasn’t done a single fucking thing for one Canadian. Douch

He is a very concerning individual.

Pierre Poilievre, leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, has been involved in several controversies throughout his political career:

• Support for the “Freedom Convoy” (2022): Poilievre endorsed the trucker convoy that occupied Ottawa in early 2022, a movement criticized for its extremist elements and disruptive tactics. 

• Fair Elections Act (2014): As Minister of State for Democratic Reform, he introduced Bill C-23, which faced criticism for potentially undermining electoral integrity by eliminating the vouching system and limiting the powers of Elections Canada. 

• Attack on Elections Canada (2014): Poilievre accused the chief electoral officer of seeking “more power, a bigger budget and less accountability,” remarks that were seen as undermining the independence of the electoral body. 

• Wearing Conservative-branded Apparel at Government Event (2015): He wore a Conservative Party shirt during a government announcement about child care benefits, leading to a ruling that he had violated campaign finance rules by blurring the lines between government activities and partisan politics. 

• Hidden YouTube Tags (2018-2022): His YouTube channel used hidden tags referencing the misogynistic “MGTOW” community. Poilievre condemned the tags, claimed ignorance, and had them removed when they were brought to light. 

• Comments on Same-Sex Marriage (2005): Initially opposed to same-sex marriage, he later reversed his stance, calling it a “success,” though his earlier opposition has been a point of contention. 

• Criticism of Anti-Racism Initiatives (2020): Poilievre faced backlash for dismissing the concept of systemic racism in Canada, arguing that the country is not systemically racist, a position that sparked debate. 

• Comparison to Donald Trump: His populist rhetoric and style have drawn comparisons to former U.S. President Donald Trump, with critics suggesting he employs similar anti-elite and provocative tactics. 

• Opposition to Canada Pension Plan (CPP) Expansion (2016): Poilievre voted against a significant enhancement of the CPP, which aimed to increase retirement benefits for Canadians. 

• Raising Retirement Age (2012): As a cabinet minister, he supported increasing the eligibility age for Old Age Security (OAS) from 65 to 67, effectively delaying access to benefits for future retirees. 

• Criticism of CPP Premium Increases (2022): Poilievre opposed scheduled increases in CPP and Employment Insurance (EI) premiums, labeling them as “paycheque taxes” and advocating for their cancellation during a period of high inflation. 

• Non-Committal on OAS Increase (2024): After supporting a motion to boost OAS payments for seniors aged 65 to 74, Poilievre later refrained from committing to implement such increases if he were to become prime minister.

These instances highlight the controversies associated with Poilievre’s political career.

Plus, even more disturbingly:

There have been recent discussions concerning foreign interference in Canadian politics, particularly involving the Conservative Party under Pierre Poilievre’s leadership. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has indicated that certain members of the Conservative Party may be susceptible to or engaged in foreign interference activities. He mentioned having names of individuals at risk and expressed concern over Poilievre’s decision not to obtain the necessary security clearance to access detailed intelligence on this matter. 

Poilievre has countered these claims by accusing Trudeau of dishonesty and demanding that any such names be made public. He maintains that neither he nor his chief of staff have been informed of any current or former Conservative members involved in foreign interference. 

Additionally, there have been reports of foreign interference in the 2022 Conservative Party leadership election, which Poilievre won. A report by the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians indicated that foreign governments, including India and China, attempted to influence the leadership race. 

It’s important to note that while these discussions involve the Conservative Party and its members, there is no public evidence directly implicating Pierre Poilievre himself as a foreign agent, publicly. At this time.