MAGA fühlt sich zensiert, weil sie auf Bluesky keine Schwachköpfe sein können

> Bluesky is a great social media platform where you don’t feel like you’re walking into a cage fight daily. Xitter, on the other hand, does not moderate content, and many of the MAGA users are abusive.

> On BlueSky, I have received zero death threats, nor have I seen maps circulated of my home. That happened on Xitter, though, and I reported them to no avail.

> MAGA feels censored on Bluesky because they can’t be dicks on the social media site that has been taking in about a million users per day. Newsweek seems to be taking sides with the abusive MAGA assholes.

> Bluesky put out a statement on Friday noting that the surge in growth on the platform has led to a sharp rise in moderation reports.

> “In the past 24 hours, we have received more than 42,000 reports (an all-time high for one day). We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour. To put that into context, in all of 2023, we received 360k reports.,” Bluesky’s Trust & Safety Team said.

> “With this significant influx of users, we’ve also seen increased spam, scam, and trolling activity — you may have seen some of this yourself. Our team is reviewing these accounts, and you can help us by reporting them by clicking the three-dot menu on each post/account,” Bluesky added.

> Bluesky CEO Jay Graber explained that Bluesky’s open design is intended to give users the option of leaving the service with all of their followers, which could thwart potential acquisition efforts, and said that it is “billionaire proof” because “everything is open source.”

what are they even doing there?