Tags
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Europa
Europe
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
UkraineWarVideoReport
Ukraine War Video Report
Ukrainian Conflict
UkrainianConflict
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News
31 Comments
can someone explain to me why trudeau saying he stands with canada and international law (will not intervene with police if they arrest someone for international warrants with crimes against humanity) and conservatives are upset?
That was a wise move by trudeau. The only way the United Nations is relevant is if member Nations abide by the laws. The icc conclusions and charges need to be respected otherwise the court becomes irrelevant.
Also known as reason #2824 to fire Trudeau
Last time I agreed with him was legalizing weed, but I’ll take it
So to PP, common sense is ignoring Canada’s obligations to ally nations and international laws and bodies the nation has agreed to?
Sounds… Less like common sense and more, oh I’m sure others have a good term.
Do it for the emergency alone
Whether Netanyahu deserves this or not, I can’t say for sure.
But the ICC issuing this warrant before targeting Iranian, Saudi, or North Korean (among others) – call me suspicious of this body’s credibility and its motives.
When Poilievre was asked about the arrest warrants & Trudeau stating he’d abide by international law, Poilievre said, “just another example of how radical and wildly woke our prime minister has become”.
https://x.com/RebelNewsOnline/status/1860081105606492226?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1860081105606492226%7Ctwgr%5E2dd2ca695efb3f9ade71f93c790f9f4c5a46785d%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rebelnews.com%2Fpoilievre_destroys_radically_woke_trudeau_israeli_pm
PP is banking on his low-information supporters to fall for this.
…that’s not how it works, Mr. PP.
So y’all want Canada to break international law.
May this be a warning so that Netanyahu won’t be dumb enough to come and make it happen, and cause an international diplomatic row.
He didn’t back anything. He just said Canada will honour international law and he will not interfere with the law enforcement from doing its job. Trudeau will not himself give the order to do anything. The Law will do it and he won’t interfere to prevent them from doing their job. That’s what I interpreted from this.
One of his dumber takes
You understand that not everyone’s sides with Palestine, right
We should back that.
This is why I don’t like PP, he too much like a Republican.
Trudeau does something right for a change.
PP is proving yet again he’s just a Harper lapdog.
Canada as a member of the icc has obligations to it. We must back the warrant
Shouldn’t EVERYONE be held accountable for breaking ANY LAWS?
Putin wasn’t arreasted shows this whole thing is a joke.
Arrest our allies while we import terrorism and our streets burn, Trudeau’s Canada.
While I have qualms about the ICC it is a recognized international body with 125 member nations. The holdouts are mainly part of the ruzzia/china/iran sphere of influence for whom obliging international rule of law would doom them, India and America. There are a few other misc countries not signatories. Virtually all of Europe, the Americas, and members of the commonwealth are signatory countries (again 1 or 2 exceptions).
Canada has always put effort into obliging international rule of law agreements and obligations. To this day that is nothing new. The only thing that is new is members of parliament stating Canada should not adhere to the rule of law (PP yesterday). That is new. And in my mind is much more problematic.
We’re so cooked with both of these idiots. Rip.
There is nothing that the CPC won’t try to weaponize. They use constant attacks, no matter how legitimate, and constant lies to whip up the base in order to have something, anything, to say.
And this sub will post anything critical of Trudeau. The CBC had a major story the other day, which was based on conservative MPs, talking about how Poilievre has completely muzzled them. All they can do is clap like trained seals and repeat stupid slogans (yes, they are instructed on the slogans).
That party is a complete farce. Poilievre has never supported government investment in the people. He is a business whore who is currently massively supported by the business community and will, once elected, do fuck all for the working poor. Look at his voting record. The man is just a chronic liar who wants power at all costs to continue serving monied interests. He has the audacity to criticize lobbyists and state that *he* won’t respond to them. Utter bullshit. The man is holding rich fundraisers constantly so that he can get people to vote against their interests in order to serve the interests of the wealthy. Which is all conservatives ever do.
Israel doesn’t own Canada.
Pierre shits in his pants to oppose Justin’s stance on potty training.
Or. Fire him for being the obvious idiot he is. Not just this
Opposition leader supports war criminals. Trudeau is right with this decision.
I love how law and order is not associated with the conservatives anymore. If you’re important enough, you get away with crimes. The conservative way.
This ruling is deeply troubled and attempts to impose the law in an extremely complex geopolitical environment.
If it’s respected, here is how it will encourage future non-state actors:
1. Attack civilian societies in a brutal and graphic manner with full intention of inviting a brutal retaliation. This in and itself is a war crime
2. Once said retaliation begins, commit more war crimes by embedding yourself in civilian population, hide your launch pads in schools and hospitals and use hostages like human shields
3. When the other party has to inevitably resort to extreme measures, cry foul and ask for outdated laws to be applied in a one sided manner
There are claims that this ruling will set precedent and I agree it will. It will signal to all non state actors and their backers how to weaponize civil society’s rule of law again themselves, while caring very little about their own population.
This ruling has all the likings of a zero tolerance policy of a school principal suspending someone for retaliating to a bully.
Now I will 100% support this ruling if along side Netanyahu, arrest warrants are also issued for the Ayatollah, his backers in Hezbollah (whoever is left) and the Qutaris for aiding and abetting criminals. We wanna talk about rule of law? Hold ALL parties responsible that instigated the war.
Until then, this is political theatrics and PP is right to oppose it.
Pierre is exhausting