Experten: DOGE-Plan zum Scheitern verurteilt, weil Musk und Ramaswamy die Ausgaben auf „Meme-Ebene“ verstehen

https://www.salon.com/2024/11/23/experts-doge-scheme-doomed-because-of-musk-and-ramaswamys-meme-level-understanding-of-spending/

26 Comments

  1. prodigalpariah on

    Because rich idiots couldn’t possibly cause untold harm or anything…

  2. senatorsparky86 on

    Unfortunately you don’t have to understand what you’re doing to cause damage and destroy. That’s this entire regime in a nutshell.

  3. Meme-level understanding is my new favorite way of insulting someone. Thx OP.

  4. longtermattention on

    The Department of Government Efficiency should start with talking to JD Vance about him walking around with two beards

  5. lokey_convo on

    I assume they are aggressively digging through the budget looking for the avocado and toast line item.

  6. ChampionshipOnly4479 on

    It’s not doomed because it’s enough to do meme-level bullshit to please the meme-level MAGA dumbfucks.

  7. They know what they’re doing. Gutting anything that will come after their money and donors. The joke is on those who believe their meme level explanations.

    These people didn’t get to where they are in the business world by not understanding basic economics…

  8. kastbort2021 on

    Yeah, they were hyping the media about cutting down $500 billion in Federal spending, and using some examples as planned parenthood ($300m), The Corporation for Public Broadcasting ($535m), international organizations ($1.5b) which amount to a whole 0.467% of their proposed cuts.

    I think the elephant in the room is that defense and VA account for 67% of all federal employees. That’s literally where most of the money goes.

    Another factor is that red states and counties have some of the highest number of federal employees.

    If they’re going to make big cuts, it is literally impossible to not also fire their own voters. So let’s see how that plays out.

  9. It’s a bummer because the civil service has real problems. It has those problems for understandable reasons but it has problems nonetheless. There are some places we could make smart changes. Not as much about saving money as by making sure we actually get the results we are paying for. The American people see those problems and the parties gave them two choices: blind defense or dynamite. They finally chose the only “fix” they were being offered.

  10. PluckPubes on

    Fox and MAGA are acting as if the concept of makings things more efficient is a new concept. No we’re not against it. We just know it’s a front for self gain and corruption.

  11. randomnighmare on

    All the articles in my news feed for days have headlines like, “Ramseorthy and Musk say they are looking forward towards bureaucratic tears”, etc…

  12. elconquistador1985 on

    We already have a department of government efficiency.

    It’s called the Office of Management and Budget.

  13. Musk’s Twitter takeover resulted in the loss of 6,000 jobs, an 80% decline in company value, around 50% loss in revenue, increased debt burden, and still has a negative cash flow.

    In short, he is a fucking idiot and does not understand efficiency, let alone the differences between government and commercial business and operations.

  14. DevilYouKnow on

    Once again America is both saved and doomed by the stupidity of evil men.

  15. We shouldn’t even have to have this discussion.

    To quote a Very Wise Person, “Jfc, America”.

  16. donkeybrisket on

    They are not serious people, and I doubt they can agree on much.

  17. Sounds like they are going to make cuts then get the government contracts to privatize what they cut.

  18. A_Dash_of_Time on

    Doesn’t matter. The goal is to chip away at the system. They’ll use the supreme court to slowly declare anything that uses federal funds to actually help people unconstitutional. They’re already giving side-eye to PBS.

  19. Disused_Yeti on

    They’re there to smash up the place not to do any detailed analysis and implement intricate plans

Leave A Reply