Großbritannien sei „direkt in den Ukraine-Krieg verwickelt“, sagt der russische Botschafter gegenüber Sky News

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/britain-directly-involved-in-ukraine-war-russian-ambassador-tells-sky-news-13257896

Von KeyConflict7069

34 Comments

  1. Why is anyone listening to anything the Russian ambassador has to say on anything?

  2. socratic-meth on

    > Speaking to Sky News’ Mark Austin, Russian ambassador to the UK Andrei Kelin also accused Ukraine of using mercenaries from different countries in the fighting.

    If he doesn’t like that he should check out what his own country is doing. I get that it is his job to be a hypocritical cunt, but what a cunt.

  3. What’s your point, ambassador to the country that started the war by invading Ukraine? I assume you have one.

  4. Beautiful-Health-976 on

    Frankly, I do not give two cents about what Russia is saying

  5. Nearby-Percentage867 on

    Perhaps if Russia weren’t “directly involved” themselves there wouldn’t be a problem.

  6. Mountain-Ad-637 on

    That’s right Ivan, keep making the right noises and stay away from upstairs windows.

  7. Oh no! The poor Russkies are upset after taking a Storm Shadow up the arse. Well strap in vatniks; there’s more where that came from!

  8. Agreeable_Theme_8025 on

    Fine. Send in the RAF then, since that’s already as they say and not that they can’t admit they are losing to a much smaller country they tried to bully.

  9. yojifer680 on

    If we use this clown world logic, Russia was “directly involved” in every single war where Russian made weapons were used.

  10. MediocreWitness726 on

    Oh, so a country using our weapons means we are directly involved?

    Russia must be directly involved in many wars then… Oh wait, they are – pot kettle black.

    Get out of Ukraine and go hibernate for a few hundred years.

  11. KeyConflict7069 on

    Quite funny this when you think about it. By Russian logic we are directly involved in this war because of a weapon system we created and sold.

    I guess they forgot they invented the AK47 and have therefore by their own logic been directly involved in basically every war, revolution and conflict of the last 70 years.

  12. MadeOfEurope on

    If the UK, or rather NATO was directly involved the war would be over very quickly

  13. therealhairykrishna on

    No chap. Any British ‘technical advisors’ are just over there touring Ukraine’s many wonderful cathedrals. 

  14. LostInTheVoid_ on

    Even if we are to the level the Ruskie’s claim. That’s on them for murdering multiple people on British soil.

  15. Sea_Valuable_116 on

    Nuclear poisoning on uk soil 
    Chemical weapon attack on uk soil
    Various Russian meddling in our politics.  
    Organised crime drugs, money laundering, sex trafficking 
    Fuck Russia and everything it stands for!!

  16. MobiuGearskin on

    Iran is directly involved by supplying drones.
    North Korea is directly involved by supplying troops.
    Belarus is directly involved by being an FOB.
    China is directly involved by helping Russia skirt sanctions.

    Shall we go on?

  17. Significant-Sign434 on

    Why dont you prove it then buddy?

    Or better yet, just fuck off home!

  18. Tall-Photo-7481 on

    Well if russia thinks we are already involved, we’ve nothing to lose by sending few tens of thousands of troops to liberate crimea, have we? I mean apparently we can’t get MORE involved…

  19. SmoothlyAbrasive on

    Directly??

    Talking shit appears to be the primary skill base of the Russian ambassador.

    The weak, sideline job we’ve been doing by only sending supplies so far, would seem to argue with that suggestion. It’s true that some Britons are indeed in Ukraine, acting in combat roles, but they aren’t members of the UK military. This is very different to the arrangement Russia have with North Korea and others, who send their active servicemen to engage in combat roles openly. The UK volunteers either have no experience as members of a military, meaning all the experience they now have is gained from fighting in Ukraine, or are former members of military units who’ve been out of the game for a while and are not part of the UK’s active or reserve list.

    There is no direct involvement from the UK in Ukraine, and it is a source of shame on us, and indeed on NATO that UK military elements are NOT in Ukraine, using what small numbers we have to play with, to make the embarrassment that Russia has been experiencing against Ukraine, look like a light roast at a well to do wedding reception.

    Fuck this guy, the horse he rode in on, the whole Russian government, and every Russian citizen who agrees, genuinely or otherwise, with the war.

  20. Common-Ad6470 on

    Just send these and the other undesirable Ruzzians in the UK back to Mordor and pull up the drawbridge.

    Living a cushy life in the West they despise so much is obviously too much for them.

  21. edinburgh1990 on

    I don’t see the problem the Russians have. It’s not a war (according to them) so all we’re doing is helping a friendly country defend against a limited special military operation. No harm done

  22. Tall_Contribution941 on

    Russia has now admitted that the war in Ukraine isn’t a special military operation?

  23. I have been sick 3 times after having panic attacks about this. I genuinely feel like ending it all I am that scared, I have small children and I am beyond terrified

  24. Millefeuille-coil on

    Maverick taught me how to communicate with Russian ambassadors.

  25. We are directly involved in the same way the USA was directly involved by shipping us raw resources in WW2. That is to say, not remotely.

  26. Someone ask him why it’s OK for Russia to get outside help (e.g. North Korea) but not OK for Ukraine to do likewise.

    They were the ones who invaded Ukraine. They could end it right now by withdrawing all their troops. It is they who are prolonging this pointless war.

    If they say “hey you aren’t allowed to do that” every time Ukraine seeks and finds help from elsewhere, then too bad.

  27. nickbyfleet on

    Oh, it’s a war now is it? I thought it was a special military exercise.

  28. And north Korea isn’t? If we’re involved bring proof, otherwise shut your facist mouths

  29. funfuse1976 on

    A NATO proxy war,we must save the the petrol dollar at all costs. Sadly all wars cost innocent lives,all soldiers have families, unfortunately it’s highly likely our government is not being honest about the reasons they are intentionally dragging the public into a full scale war.

  30. throwaway948485027 on

    Question for those who are more aware of Russias strengths and weaknesses. Besides the threat of nuclear war, can Russia afford to go to war with other countries? From the outside it looks like they’re struggling to take Ukraine. All I’ve heard is Russia is some military superpower, yet they can’t seem to steamroll Ukraine. Obviously Ukraine has indirect help via weapons supplied from the west, but if that’s enough to keep Russia at bay for years, why should anyone be worried. I also, naively, do question how real that threat of nuclear war is? At what point is it just empty threats, Russia can’t just go about threatening nukes on countries who don’t let them get their way

Leave A Reply