Reichweite von ATACMS-Raketen

Von giuliomagnifico

21 Comments

  1. Mundane_Emu8921 on

    Ukraine has confirmed the launch of ATACMS at targets inside Russia. Early this morning, 2 ATACMS hit an arsenal in Bryansk Oblast.

    This means that America has attacked Russia.

    For all Western missiles you need access to satellite guidance systems (GPS) and you need actual Western troops to program flight paths for those missiles.

    Russia made clear that the use of Western missiles inside Russia would be interpreted as the West attacking them.

    So, this morning Putin officially updated Russia’s nuclear doctrine, allowing for a nuclear first strike on nations threatening the security of Russia.

    This is serious.

    Even if Russia doesn’t use nukes, the consequences of this action will be severe. There are plenty of options available to deal serious damage.

    – For example, Russia could target the Kyiv dam, flooding the capital with icy water, killing thousands of civilians and shutting down Ukrainian logistics.

    – Or Russia could finally target decision making centers, the Rada, the presidential palace, etc.

    – Their response may not be limited just to Ukraine. They could arm the Houthis with the P-800 Oinks.

    It is insane that America did this. And in response to a large Russian missile wave on Ukrainian power plants?

    That attack wasn’t the biggest of the war. Ukrainian power grid has been attacked throughout the war, they already ration electricity nationwide.

    Why did we escalate when we know this will be bad?

  2. FirstCircleLimbo on

    Storm Shadow / SCALP har a range of 500 km, so Ukraine may be able to hit the Kremlin now…

  3. b1gCubanC1gar on

    This is why Russia didn’t want NATO on its borders, but they ended uonwirh NATO on their borders anyway

  4. Hot_Independence5048 on

    Is red the territory Russia has captured or it is the main fields of battle?

  5. EmperorThan on

    [Russia waking up this morning.](https://i.imgur.com/6FIF6pJ.png)

    Edit: **Ut oh** I see the ZZ have entered the thread. So I’ll add “Why doesn’t Russia just give up parts of its Kursk territory to achieve peace?”

  6. chattyfish on

    don’t know why local guys are happy about. well, some more missiles will fall on the russians but due to the large spread of infrastructure across the territory, nothing will happen.

    on the other hand, russia itself produces weapons and has plenty of medium-range missiles. ukraine will simply receive more attacks on its compact infrastructure in response.

    a great plan. reliable as a swiss watch, if i understood everything correctly.

    upd: yeah guys feel free to downvote, this will undoubtedly help ukraine.

  7. Fine_Advantage_8934 on

    I would love to see the way when russia will fall and the slaves will get freedom

  8. It won’t make any difference. This war is coming to an end in 2025.

  9. ScottishThox1 on

    I have never been more excited to see a bridge collapse than I am now.

  10. This is the official range I presume? Their actual capabilities might well be better. Not an insane amount, but maybe enough to hit Moscow?

  11. CitizenOfTheWorld42 on

    Brought to you by Lockheed Martin, a major player in military industrial complex. It’s getting repetitive on so many levels and realms…

  12. Now the shitshow is about to happen? Didn’t expect Ukraine to fire tbh

  13. AspectofCosine on

    Interesting how this fails to mention the fact that these have only been approved for use in Kursk oblast.

Leave A Reply