USC-Studie zeigt, dass Wildbrandschutzmittel mit giftigen Metallen beladen ist

https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-11-16/popular-fire-retardant-has-high-levels-of-heavy-metals-usc-study-finds

6 Comments

  1. fairlyaveragetrader on

    We know, but sadly, wildfire is extremely toxic. Anyone who has ever been through one remembers that constant headache that won’t go away, the itchy eyes, the burning lungs

  2. PresidentialBoneSpur on

    It’s unclear in the article, but I’m going to guess it’s the vibrant pigment in the retardant which chiefly contains these heavy metals.

  3. Read it first as wildlife not wildfire. Was like that’s odd, but makes sense.😂

  4. luckyguy25841 on

    So what’s USC’s recommendation to use as an alternative competent? Or is it nothing?

Leave A Reply