Does it break the rules of the game when every finger is pointed at him?
R0n1nR3dF0x on
There’s so many of them…
morenewsat11 on
When the line between satire and reality becomes blurred.
> Poilievre responded forcefully to Trudeau’s gambit, demanding the PM release the names publicly, even though that would potentially compromise an ongoing RCMP investigation. Poilievre could of course find out the identity of the people involved, but that would require him to get his security clearance. To date he has chosen not to on account of the fact that being a national security risk is all part of the bad boy makeover he went through last summer.
ToolsOfIgnorance27 on
If he starts with himself, then perhaps we’ll take it seriously.
BiscottiNatural5587 on
I’m going to guess “all 3 parties have had some taste of treason but instead of dealing with it, we’re now trying to weaponize it as a political mud slinging tool instead of doing what’s right for Canada!”
Single_Rain4899 on
Justin Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh, Pierre Poilievre.
Next question.
Royal-Call-6700 on
HOC?
olmeca64 on
First guess…. I SPY A TRAITOR FCKIN JUSTIN TRUDEAU 💯🤮
joven_of_slave on
we know there are traitors. we know the list exists. for him to say he has a list of conservatives who are compromised means nothing. because thats only 30% at most of the corruption if i was a betting man. i think the country deserved to see the whole list and i cant wait for the whistle blowers to leak it to see just how close to the truth we were guessing
FromundaCheeseLigma on
All of them?
PrairieScott on
This fucking guy
fuzzypotatopeel72 on
So do we start taking treason seriously like it should be?
Difficult-Celery-891 on
Reminds me of those color charts that the bush administration used to randomly scare people. Remember Rumsfeld coming out and just declaring
“We’re raising the alert status to ORANGE! SOMEONE SOMEWHERE IS OUT THERE TRYING GET US!”
13 Comments
Does it break the rules of the game when every finger is pointed at him?
There’s so many of them…
When the line between satire and reality becomes blurred.
> Poilievre responded forcefully to Trudeau’s gambit, demanding the PM release the names publicly, even though that would potentially compromise an ongoing RCMP investigation. Poilievre could of course find out the identity of the people involved, but that would require him to get his security clearance. To date he has chosen not to on account of the fact that being a national security risk is all part of the bad boy makeover he went through last summer.
If he starts with himself, then perhaps we’ll take it seriously.
I’m going to guess “all 3 parties have had some taste of treason but instead of dealing with it, we’re now trying to weaponize it as a political mud slinging tool instead of doing what’s right for Canada!”
Justin Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh, Pierre Poilievre.
Next question.
HOC?
First guess…. I SPY A TRAITOR FCKIN JUSTIN TRUDEAU 💯🤮
we know there are traitors. we know the list exists. for him to say he has a list of conservatives who are compromised means nothing. because thats only 30% at most of the corruption if i was a betting man. i think the country deserved to see the whole list and i cant wait for the whistle blowers to leak it to see just how close to the truth we were guessing
All of them?
This fucking guy
So do we start taking treason seriously like it should be?
Reminds me of those color charts that the bush administration used to randomly scare people. Remember Rumsfeld coming out and just declaring
“We’re raising the alert status to ORANGE! SOMEONE SOMEWHERE IS OUT THERE TRYING GET US!”
“Can you be more specific?”
“No!”