13 Comments

  1. dagthegnome on

    Does it break the rules of the game when every finger is pointed at him?

  2. morenewsat11 on

    When the line between satire and reality becomes blurred.

    > Poilievre responded forcefully to Trudeau’s gambit, demanding the PM release the names publicly, even though that would potentially compromise an ongoing RCMP investigation. Poilievre could of course find out the identity of the people involved, but that would require him to get his security clearance. To date he has chosen not to on account of the fact that being a national security risk is all part of the bad boy makeover he went through last summer.

  3. ToolsOfIgnorance27 on

    If he starts with himself, then perhaps we’ll take it seriously.

  4. BiscottiNatural5587 on

    I’m going to guess “all 3 parties have had some taste of treason but instead of dealing with it, we’re now trying to weaponize it as a political mud slinging tool instead of doing what’s right for Canada!”

  5. Single_Rain4899 on

    Justin Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh, Pierre Poilievre.

    Next question.

  6. joven_of_slave on

    we know there are traitors. we know the list exists. for him to say he has a list of conservatives who are compromised means nothing. because thats only 30% at most of the corruption if i was a betting man. i think the country deserved to see the whole list and i cant wait for the whistle blowers to leak it to see just how close to the truth we were guessing

  7. fuzzypotatopeel72 on

    So do we start taking treason seriously like it should be?

  8. Difficult-Celery-891 on

    Reminds me of those color charts that the bush administration used to randomly scare people. Remember Rumsfeld coming out and just declaring

    “We’re raising the alert status to ORANGE! SOMEONE SOMEWHERE IS OUT THERE TRYING GET US!”

    “Can you be more specific?”

    “No!”

Leave A Reply