Close Menu
    Daten

    [OC] Aktienmarktentwicklung unter Präsidenten seit Rutherford Hayes


    [OC] Aktienmarktentwicklung unter Präsidenten seit Rutherford Hayes

    Von MTabarrok

    View 17 Comments

    17 Comments

    2. spaceporter on

      Clinton and Obama smooching at the end is wild given the completely different views on their economic performance.

    3. SpicyButterBoy on

      While these data are interesting, this visualization is extremely hard to parse. 

    4. sabre_toothed_llama on

      The inconsistency between full middle name, middle initial, and middle name being absent is driving me nuts. Who does that? Lol

    5. Jackdaw99 on

      Sorry, friend, but this is far from beautiful, and may not even be data. I look at that first blue spike over on the left, there, wonder who it is, and try to follow the line to find out. It’s simply impossible to do so.

    10. Mr-Blah on

      Impossible to read? Check.

      Basic graphing with bad axis? Check

      Welcome to the front page of DIB!

    11. Gingerstachesupreme on

      **William Jefferson Clinton** sounds like what Hillary calls Bill when he was in trouble.

    12. Jackdaw99 on

      I should also point out that, while you say ‘Presidents Since Rutherford Hayes’, there are more than a few missing. Carter, Kennedy, Bush Jr., etc.

    13. WhiskeyDelta89 on

      Could you please share your definition of “beautiful”? I’m honestly curious.

    14. Nethri on

      If this is accurate, and I’m not smart enough to say that it is or isn’t.. the Reagan thing is interesting, he’s kind of right in the middle of everyone else. Makes me wonder if that’s part of (not all) the reason he’s so polarizing economically.

    15. FrikiQC on

      Unreadable. I know you wanted to use 2 colours for the purpose of showing parties, but each president different color would be better.

      And where are Trump and Biden?

    16. johnniewelker on

      Data is not really beautiful

      Content is okay but there are no insights provided by OP, so what to do with it?

      IMO, any presidents with less than 4 years don’t truly impact the stock market. I’m sure it happens, but 8 years is a better time span. That being said, I’m shocked FDR numbers are so low. Dude had 12 years starting with a depressed baseline + WW2 to add to it.

    17. SharpHawkeye on

      This would be a lot clearer if you separated the one termers and two termers into separate graphs.

    Leave A Reply