2 Comments

    1. FromundaCheeseLigma on

      Can we just finally start acknowledging that all of this has always ever been about wage suppression and wealth preservation? Any other problems caused by a horrible immigration policy are just along for the ride.

      This was absolutely deliberate

    2. Difficult-Yam-1347 on

      Points:

      Determining how much to reduce immigration depends on:

      • Desired pop-to-house ratio.

      • Target date to achieve ratio.

      • Number of houses Canada can construct over time.

      Scenario calculations suggest:

      • Re-establishing the 2021 population-to-house ratio by 2031 [this was already bad]

      • Building houses in 2024–31 at the same rate as 2016–23.

      • The 2016–23 period had the highest 8-year housing completions since 1975–82.

      • Uncertainty exists if this construction rate can be sustained due to industry stresses.

      • Based on this scenario, Canada needs to limit new PRs and net increase in NPRs to an average of 175,000 per year until 2031.

      • This is a significant reduction from the 640,000 per year average over the past 5 years.

      • The federal government plans to limit NPRs to 5% of the population.

      • Under this plan, a net reduction of 680,000 NPRs by 2031 would occur.

      • This allows for an average increase of PRs of 270,000 per year, nearly halving current target of 500,000.

      • The average annual increase in PRs before the current government was 255,000 per year.

    Leave A Reply