Tags
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Europa
Europe
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
Ukrainian Conflict
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News
24 Comments
I’m honorary
How are Denmark and Iran in the same racial category? My Gods…
“Racially compromised” = “the natives have not been eradicated yet.”
Somalia and Djibouti probably wouldn’t be orange.
I know you did so because they would be grouped as “Arab”, but they only joined the Arab league much after Hitler’s time after gaining independence and weren’t really considered Arab until then (they still aren’t really).
“Racially compromised” holy shiiiit
Well, the Nazis were never noted for being particularly intelligent.
I dont get it. Most of South America is classified as “mediterranean” despite countries like Peru and Bolivia being largely composed of people with a large indigenous background. Argentina and Uruguay have a larger european heritage in that aspect. Still abouth south america, Brazil itself has a much larger population of european origin than the countries mentioned, and is classified as inferior. Probably because they saw the large number of black people there as a problem, idk. Maybe Im just trying to see logic in something that has no logic
And, for once, Portugal can’t into Eastern Europe. It’s also interesting enought that Brasil and the rest of South America have different colors, presumedly anti-black racism? And why is Mexico a different color than the rest of Hispanoamerica?
Costa Rica is less white than Ecuador according to them lol
Wonder what Brazil and Mexico did wrong in their eyes compared to rest of latam. Argentina is pretty white but Bolivia by comparison is very native.
Trying to document and make sense of Nazi views on race is like trying to catch smoke with your hands. The fact is that Nazi racial views were inconsistent, driven by political expediency, and based around pseudoscience and pseudo history.
In the end fascism is a death cult. If somehow the Germans had won WWII the classifications of who is and who is not an aryan, and therefore human, would have likely continued to whittle down and down and down into increasingly smaller groups, with the folks found outside the new arbitrary circle being labeled as corrupted, or insidious, or weak or what have you. The Nazis would need a constant internal enemy to distract the population with and maintain an air of paranoia and besiegement. People would be trying to prove the race of their great great great grandmother and show that no one from that generation onward ever kissed a Jew.
This map is a good attempt, but the issue is that it makes it seem like the Nazi’s had a concrete racial system in mind when it was so often based around if Hitler was having a temper tantrum about the group in question.
Seeing as Nazis appropriated Indian symbols…..why are we “honorary”. The word “Aryan” is Sanskrit and the Swastika is a religious symbol…….
Using 21st century country borders makes little sense.
Aryan Iranians
Reality must have hit hard when the Nazis arrive in South America and realize that the majority of the continent is inhabited by Mestizos(Amerindian & Whites). So by their definition, inferior.
Greenland:
# Still No Data.
Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru were “Mediterranean”? Yeah… that’s fucking stupid.
[“czechs are racially inferior” highly related to germans genetically…](https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/1fexo53/ydna_similarity_between_czechia_and_other/)
also this map does seem to be a bit of a monstrosity; I see no sources, entire countries are treated as proxies for races, they’re MODERN COUNTRIES (that didn’t exist during Nazi party’s influence), it seems to be a mix of what would be considered party policy with what Hitler/the party later decreed just for political expedience during the war.
Their classification make no sense at all 🤡
Source?
Jew here.
The first victims of Nazi germany were the mentally ill and the physically disabled.
They confiscated a Jewish mansion in Berlin with the address “Tiergarten 4” later, they used this mansion to send letters to the families of mentally and physically ill people living in closed wards saying they were “died in unfortunate circumstances”. The real reason for their deaths were in fact anesthetic injection, “Gas Trucks” (a truck where the exhaust was diverted to the trunk), and later, Gas chambers.
Those same tactics were used later in the Holocaust on LGBTQ, Sinti and Roma, political rivals and also Jews.
This map doesn’t convey the prejudice and the hate the Nazis had for disabled men (who lives amongst all nations…)
As a Bulgarian – this is wrong at least for us.
We’ve many “origins” stories like all nations do, they’re all fake the same they are as for all nations, but during WW2 we were allied with the Nazis and were seen as Turkic and not Slavic, expressly because the latter would conflict with their party’s ideological bs.
Anyway the rest is probably accurate, but I thought it was interesting nonetheless how subjective and flexible “race” can be 🙂
Edit: LATAM as Mediterranean?! Wtf?
This isn’t hierarchy ranking order, just a genocide priority list
Indians were not classified as honorary aryans later on. Instead ” he” thought of Indians as an inferior race and justified British rule in India India even though Nazis were enemies of Brits. He strongly believed in aryan invasion theory and supported the idea that the fair skinned aryan ancestors of Europe civilized the dark skinned natives of india and many more things
Source: Google, Dr vaibhav purandare, etc