Scientific American unterstützt zum zweiten Mal Kamala Harris

https://www.axios.com/2024/09/16/scientific-american-kamala-harris-2024

17 Comments

  1. “The magazine made its first-ever endorsement of President Biden in 2020.”

  2. plz-let-me-in on

    > This is only the second time in the magazine’s 179-year history that it has made an endorsement in a presidential race.

    > The magazine made its first-ever endorsement of President Biden in 2020.

    This is only the second time ever that *Scientific American* has endorsed a candidate in a presidential election in its 179-year history, once again endorsing the candidate running against Donald Trump. While this is pretty historical, it probably isn’t a huge surprise: Kamala Harris is the only candidate in this race who actually believes in science.

  3. Worried_Quarter469 on

    Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it was endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 race, citing her plans to improve the nation’s health care system, fight climate change and support reproductive rights.

    [article has more in depth]

  4. sugarlessdeathbear on

    Thanks to Trump all kinds of people and entities that would not normally make a political endorsement are doing so.

  5. KidKilobyte on

    Science is the pursuit of Truth, Trump is the antithesis of this.

  6. BoringFloridaMan on

    You can probably count on zero fingers how many Trump supporters read SA.

  7. specklebrothers on

    No Scientific American endorsement

    No Wall Paid for By Mexico

    No Lock her Up

    No Hunter in jail

    No second term

    No help from Supreme Court

    No court cases won

    No proud boys

    No 2024

    So much losing !

  8. This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://www.axios.com/2024/09/16/scientific-american-kamala-harris-2024) reduced by 64%. (I’m a bot)
    *****
    > Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it was endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 race, citing her plans to improve the nation's health care system, fight climate change and support reproductive rights.

    > Zoom in: The editors went on to compare Harris and Trump's records and proposed policies across health care, gun safety, reproductive rights, climate and technology.

    > State of play: The Scientific American is just the latest influential endorsement for Harris.

    *****
    [**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/1fihi3r/scientific_american_makes_secondever_endorsement/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ “Version 2.02, ~693938 tl;drs so far.”) | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr “PM’s and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome.”) | *Top* *keywords*: **Trump**^#1 **Harris**^#2 **editors**^#3 **reproductive**^#4 **magazine**^#5

  9. Few-Maintenance-2966 on

    Can wait for Trump to post his hate for science. Which we already knew.

  10. dreaganusaf on

    Harris compared to the anti science, anti public health, seditious insurrectionist felon…it’s not a difficult choice.

  11. >Harris “offers the country better prospects, relying on science, solid evidence and the willingness to learn from experience,” the magazine’s editors wrote.

    >”She pushes policies that boost good jobs nationwide by embracing technology and clean energy. She supports education, public health and reproductive rights” and “treats the climate crisis as the emergency it is.”

  12. cobaltjacket on

    It would probably shock no one that science & medicine types are overwhelmingly anti-Trump.

  13. pythonwarg on

    The first time they endorsed a candidate it was Biden. He turned out to be the worst President in history, and mentally unfit to run for a second term.

Leave A Reply