Warum so viele von uns in Bezug auf die Raketenabwehr falsch lagen

SS: Kind of a confused Article. It seems to be proposing that Israel’s success against Iranian missiles show Missile defense can work. He also argues modern detection and sensor technology is advanced and thus missile defense can work.

thus US should spend money on more missile defense. That there is large community who argue against spending on Missile defense and they should not be believed.

My Own Take:
People have argued many times how Missile defense is too costly cause Missiles will always be cheaper than missile defense. I would have thought this question would have been resolved by the fact that Hypersonic missiles exist and it is now a hyped up/viral weapon tech that everyone is touting.

The more missile defense develops, the more hypersonic missile will develop with more decoys, more manueverability. Yes, better missile defense make simple ballistic missiles useless. But these better missile defenses are also extremely costly per shot. So, once they run out, old and slow ballistic missiles will again become useful.

The question is, Is it worth it to spend money on this while other adversaries are rapidly buildup up other forms of weapons like more navy ships, more planes, more carriers and so on.