Neue Klimakarten zeigen die veränderten Vereinigten Staaten

Von Mr__O__

6 Comments

  1. monkeywaffles on

    it’s not clear to me at first glance why areas that suddenly move into the ‘good’ area only see 1% gdp growth as a result, while places moving ‘out of the zone’ see -70%

    now I get that coastal areas will get worse, but areas moving from yellow to green would certainly gain the same crop advantage that formerly belonged to the old place?

    of course, many areas in yellow are still successful farming areas, so then, the first couple pictures I’m confused the point, as it’s not really colored right to show the impact. yellow turns green, whatever, green turns yellow, everyone dies

    not disputing any data, just the ‘beauty’ of the data to impart what they mean

  2. So_spoke_the_wizard on

    For the past four or five years, we’ve been planning our retirement. Traditionally, retirees move based on taxes and low cost of living. Most of those places are where climate change is going to hit hardest. Not to mention overcrowding and rampant growth.

    We are willing to pay taxes for a place that will be environmentally comfortable for the next 25-30 years with a good quality of life. Our family thinks we’re crazy. But we’ve been very successful at finding great places to live that are counter to the trends.

  3. They’ve been saying this crap for decades now and not one ounce of it comes true. Just like in the 1970’s we were headed for a “new Ice Age.” I can remember being in High School in the early 2000’s and they were saying Wisconsin would be a tropical climate by the 2030’s.

    Scare tactics, and nothing more.

Leave A Reply