Zur Sicherung kritischer Mineralien sind weitere Minen im Vereinigten Königreich erforderlich, warnt der Wachhund

https://www.ft.com/content/b1393700-8218-44e4-b432-7dd3073a6bce

Von SlySquire

6 Comments

  1. Now that could deliver some quality local growth to areas that really need it

  2. somnamna2516 on

    Cue a load of miserable nimbys with full on compoface in the local press: ‘saffron Walden residents against the mines’

  3. grapplinggigahertz on

    Never going to happen.

    When you have to spend almost £300 million pounds just on the planning application for a road before you even put a spade in the ground, then the UK is utterly fucked when it comes to any sort of construction project – [https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunnel-project-delayed-after-planning-it-cost-more-than-worlds-longest-road-tunnel-13230526](https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunnel-project-delayed-after-planning-it-cost-more-than-worlds-longest-road-tunnel-13230526)

  4. No chance, I work in the supply chain for mines and the UK is an absolute nightmare for starting projects. In my experience, the ESG requirements make them unviable.

    When I found out Woodsmith was using a tunnel to transport ore 30miles to the coast, I was absolutely amazed. Everywhere else they’d just have used trains or a pipeline.

    Also, the impression of modern mining is completely outdated in the UK. The reality is one of highly paid jobs with very little footprint, especially if they’re underground.

Leave A Reply