Tags
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Europa
Europe
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
UkraineWarVideoReport
Ukraine War Video Report
Ukrainian Conflict
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News
11 Comments
[deleted]
Your opinion on the guy doesn’t matter: He’s obviously got a pretty solid case here.
> Actor Alec Baldwin has filed a civil lawsuit for malicious prosecution and civil rights violations in the fatal shooting of a cinematographer on the set of the Western movie “Rust.”
> Baldwin also alleges defamation in the suit, saying that prosecutors and investigators intentionally mishandled evidence as they pursued the case.
> Defendants named in the lawsuit include special prosecutor Kari Morrissey and Santa Fe District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies, along with investigators from the Santa Fe County sheriff’s office.
> “Defendants sought at every turn to scapegoat Baldwin for the acts and omissions of others, regardless of the evidence or the law,” the lawsuit states.
Good, I hope he wins. That prosecutor was insane.
He should win whether you like him personally or not going by that nutcase office’s behavior.
He’s clearly in the right here
he should win this tbh from what i heard at the time of his aquittal the prosecutor did a shocker of a job
He seems like an asshole but she’s despicable. Someone with significant power who corruptly wielded it to make a name for herself.
Good Luck. The prosecutors protect the police, judges protect prosecutors, appeals courts protect judges, and the SCOTUS protects appeals courts.
It’s a crazy legal system designed to 1st and foremost protect itself. Justice for the innocent is almost always elusive in a fight against the legal system.
Everyone is saying he is right and this is an obvious win, but as someone who really didn’t follow the case, can someone explain *why*?
Textbook misconduct case.
One piece of evidence is a judgement from the bench quoting the ineptitude of the prosecutor.
That’s not subjective and holds merit in the civil suit.