Ist der bedingungslose Schutz von Yoon Suk Yeol eine edle Mission? Der Sicherheitsdienst des Präsidenten könnte als „Interne Rebellionswache“ abgeschafft werden

**The Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO) Incident:**

• CIO attempted to execute an arrest warrant for President Yoon Suk-yeol

• Was blocked by Presidential Security Service (PSS) resistance

• Plans to punish PSS leadership for obstruction and abuse of power

**PSS Response and Concerns:**

• Refused to execute warrant, citing presidential safety

• This justification deemed insufficient for blocking treason investigation

• PSS head Park Jong-joon (former Saenuri Party candidate) suspected of involvement

**Historical Context and Criticism:**

• PSS originated during Park Chung-hee military regime

• Criticized as being accountable only to the President

• Contrasts with other countries where security organizations report to various ministries

**Recent Developments:**

• Former President Moon Jae-in’s attempt to transfer security office to National Police Agency failed

• Calls for PSS abolition may resurface after President Yoon’s dismissal

• Democratic Party floor leader demands PSS officials be treated as treason accomplices

**Current Status:**

• CIO planning legal action against approximately 200 PSS personnel

• Charges to include special obstruction of performance of official duties

• Investigation ongoing into treason allegations

Protecting the individual is one thing, but aiding and abetting the obstruction the execution of a lawful order of a court should be an offence. This is not noble. It is criminal.