Tags
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Europa
Europe
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
UkraineWarVideoReport
Ukraine War Video Report
Ukrainian Conflict
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News
5 Comments
[deleted]
These companies have given up on pretending to enhance our lives and they’re racing to create as many addicts within their walled gardens as possible. By discouraging external links, they’re dividing the web into fiefdoms, rather than creating a vast interconnected vibrant network. The Internet has never felt so barren.
This article is important. Bias is present, but so are facts in abundance.
This is a great explanation of how technology companies and end users no longer have aligned incentives.
They don’t update to help you – they update to help themselves to more revenue at all costs. (enshitification)
Someone called /r/technology readers Luddites but then chickened out and deleted their comment.
There’s nothing the Ed is arguing against in that post that marks him or anyone who agrees with him as a Luddite. The last 5 years, _at least_, of Big Tech has been actively hostile to anyone trying to actually use the very real technological advancements that gained Big Tech its audience in the first place. Nobody is saying we should just turn the internet off; we’d just like it to be fucking useful for a change.
And I think you can level this criticism at AI. I’m not against AI in principle… the current implementation is deeply problematic, and I agree there’s a plateauing of utility vs. cost going on, and it remains to be seen if that can be overcome.
To use the Luddite comparison, the automated looms produced more output at an acceptable, but in some ways worse, quality than could be done by hand. AI is similar… it can scratch the surface of replacing certain job responsibilities, or some jobs outright (elevator music creators are doomed), and it’ll likely get better at that. There’s an argument to be had about how that’s rolled out, but there’s not much room to argue that it shouldn’t be used at all because jobs. How we adapt to it is another question.
But this AI slop phenomenon? And companies like Meta leaning into it and intentionally polluting their platform with it? That’s not real progress. It’s costly, consumer-hostile bullshit. That’s what Ed is on about.