Es heißt, dass es in Finnisch-Lappland keinen Schnee gab, als sie dort waren, und dass sie 3.500 £ für ihren Urlaub ausgegeben haben. Es wird auf BBC veröffentlicht, einem der größten Nachrichtensender der Welt.
Andererseits war ihr Reiseveranstalter kooperativ. Und sie haben immer noch einige der Aktivitäten durchgeführt.
Was denkt ihr alle? Macht dieser Artikel Lappland für Sie weniger attraktiv?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg3llqq41wo
Von carolapluto
7 Comments
I doubt it. The weather ofcourse would, but that’s always been the case. It’ll impact the travel agency more
Stupid Finland for not having snow, they should have put some out there for these people!
But the irony of flying somewhere and then being sad that global warming is ruining it for everyone.
This makes Tui look bad, not Finland. Weather is always subject to change, anybody travelling should know that. But if they want to blame Finland then I suppose global warming is at play here.
Reading their complaints, it seems like the travel company had advertised a policy and then didn’t stick to it. I think the family has a point, they even raised their concern before travel expecting to be rescheduled as per the policy. The matter is between them and TUI, I don’t think our country as a travel destination is really involved. It could just as well be about a “sunny weather guarantee” to a beach destination etc
I was expecting them to blame Finnish government…
If you’re dumb enough to spend your entire family savings on a trip to Lapland, you don’t deserve snow.
But to answer your initial question: No it’ll not affect, on the contrary, this year already has scheduled twice as many flight to Lapland as the year before
BBC seems to be having a field day with this news!!!