Tags
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Europa
Europe
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
UkraineWarVideoReport
Ukraine War Video Report
Ukrainian Conflict
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News
2 Comments
Submission Statement
The one piece of “good” news in the IEA’s forecasts is that they are consistently wrong – but in a good way, by underestimating the speed of renewables growth. Their[ track record of being wrong on this every single year stretches back to the 20th century](https://bsky.app/profile/profraywills.bsky.social/post/3lbnt3hctl223). Still, their underlying point is sound. Displacing coal from the planet’s energy use is still a vast, mammoth effort.
It’s interesting to ask why the IEA always gets it so wrong, and what hope this gives us for the future. Some people think the issue is that the IEA analysts apply old 20th century big-industry era models to energy trends, when in fact renewables adoption behaves more like 21st century technology like the internet, smartphones and computing.
Let’s hope so. The ramp up in global (mostly Chinese) manufacturing that has slashed solar prices, seems to be happening with batteries and grid storage. Numerous grid battery solutions are in development, with things like sodium-ion batteries looking very promising. Still, the fossil fuel industry has deep pockets, extensive networks of influence/corruption, and intends to derail the energy transition.
Thank you Greenpeace for being so anti clear nuclear energy that the world instead ended up burning hundreds of gigatons of carbon