https://www.rtl.lu/news/national/a/2253450.html
Am Samstag wird ein Mann beim Diebstahl von Alkohol im Wert von mehreren hundert Euro in einem Geschäft erwischt.
Den Ladenbesitzern und der Polizei wird klar, dass er bereits am Vortag im Laden gestohlen hat.
Überprüfungen auf dem Sender zeigen, dass er für mehrere Einbrüche und Diebstähle bekannt ist
Sie überprüfen seine persönlichen Gegenstände und finden Werkzeuge, um Einbrüche zu begehen.
Außerdem beleidigt der Mann die Beamten und verhält sich unannehmbar.
Der Staatsanwalt beschließt, ihn freizulassen und spricht keine Festnahme aus.
Wie sollen wir der Justiz vertrauen, wenn sie nach mehreren Diebstählen, Einbrüchen und Beleidigungen von Polizisten keine Menschen festnimmt?
Kein Wunder, dass Kleinkriminalität und unerwünschtes Verhalten in der Höhe zunehmen "System" toleriert dieses Verhalten…
Von wavefan13
3 Comments
>
Translation of the article:
On Saturday morning, a patrol was called to a store on Place Joseph Thorn in the city after a man tried to steal alcohol.
The man was no stranger: he had already stolen from the same store on Friday, but was able to escape.
At the police station, officers discovered that the man had already been arrested several times for burglary and theft. During the body search, tools for breaking in were found.
Since the man was also behaving inappropriately at the police station and did not calm down, he was also booked for insulting an official in addition to the theft.
Edit:
>The Public Prosecutor decides to let him walk free and doesn’t pronounce an arrest
Where do you take that from?
Tools to break in are not proof of break-ins, alas. So there’s only _one_ case documenting two incidents that happened in a short period of time. Not much to go on:
You put people in jail pre-trial when a) there’s a flight risk (address unknown, foreign citizen), b) there’s a serious offense (100€ stolen ain’t it), c) there’s a serious risk of the serious offense being reiterated or a risk of pressuring witnesses.
Since those conditions aren’t met, what would be nice, is go be able to judge the person within weeks after they got arrested. Only quick and systematic punitive justice (pre-trial jail is _not_ a punishment) is an efficient deterrent.
Ergo, we’d need three times more judges sitting in criminal chambers, and a proportionately beefed up judicial support staff (clerks, registrars, legal assistants).
“ The Public Prosecutor decides to let him walk free and doesnt pronounce an arrest.”
Not sure where you got this from but the articles doesn’t mention the bit in quotation marks