Der IWF ist davon überzeugt, dass es für die Partner kostengünstiger ist, die Ukraine jetzt zu finanzieren, als ihre Niederlage zu riskieren

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/11/22/7485836/

5 Comments

  1. purdy_panties83 on

    Funding Ukraine now is just common sense. Letting it fall would cost way more in refugee crises, military spending, and global instability. Ukraine’s proven they can handle aid responsibly, so why hesitate? Plus, using frozen Russian assets to finance their recovery? That’s justice in action.

  2. Elegant-Efficiency43 on

    Can’t believe I’m saying this but I agree with Boris Johnson that NATO should approve a 500B loan to Ukraine and membership status. If this happens, it’s game over for Russia.

    Maybe nato members should also volunteer their soldiers to secure non combat zones. If Russia attacks those areas, Russia is attacking NATO.

  3. It’s absurd that it takes it to be more cost effective that things start to actually happen than protecting lives in the first place. I get that it’s more nuanced than that but still. I guess doing the right thing due monetary reasons is at least them taking action eventually.

Leave A Reply