Während Bidën damit beginnt, die Beschränkungen gegenüber der #Ukraine aufzuheben, indem er die #ATACAMS-Beschränkungen aufhebt, ist das gut, großartig! Aber die eigentliche Frage wird sein; Wird es bald auch eine #Tomahawk-Rakete geben? Dieses System ist eines der wenigen Systeme, das (in Bezug auf die Reichweite) in der Lage ist, die Flugplätze zu treffen, die Russland für die TU-95 nutzt.
With Biden starting to release the restraints on #Ukraine by lifting the #ATACAMS limitations, Ok well Great! But the real question will be; will there be #Tomahawk missile soon as well? That system is one of the only systems capable (range-wise) to hit the airfields Russia is using for the TU-95.
— Erik G.M. (@erikgmelig.bsky.social) 2024-11-17T19:03:42.858Z
10 Comments
> With Bidën…
I saw what you did there.
Hi mods, can we please remove this ridiculous censoring of links that mention Biden? The election is over and Biden was not even part of it!
What happened to free speech on Reddit?
Okay, this is just silly. The chances of Ukraine getting Tomahawks are full-stop zero.
They’ll get Tomahawks, but the best we can do is 2029 (maybe).
“We will support Ukraine’s defense against this illegal invasion with every means according to the laws of war.” That’s all he had to say. Wouldn’t have had to speak again on the situation. Instead we are on this ridiculous road of back-and-forth with Russia as if they are our peers.
And the goal posts get moved.
We will not give Ukraine Tomahawks. LOL..
Let’s imagine a scenario by which President Biden never dropped out of the 2024 Presidential race and won. In that case, he would only consider supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks by the January 2026 with projected delivery of May 2026.
What I wish had happened was we trucked a few hundred missiles to the front lines and _then_ announced unlimited strikes.
You should read again. They only have long range for certain regions, what airfields are Russia using in those regions?
AFAIK Ukraine doesn’t have any platforms capable of launching tomahawks.