Would love it , if it was by ethnicity rather than the nation they were fighting for
WorkOk4177 on
The contribution for the world wars from British colonies especially India often gets ignored, thankfully the causality image acknowledges it
Administrator90 on
How often this was reposted?
And how often people wonder about the high death number of Turkey / Ottoman Empire? (-> Armenian genocide)
Sitheref0874 on
Personally, casualties expressed as a %age of population is more useful.
thedarkpath on
Serbia still recovering
germinal_velocity on
Dark Russia tells an even darker story: their refusal to get out of the war was the proximate cause of the Bolshevik Revolution. And think how many corpses **that** eventually led to.
malaka789 on
With the current wars going on and constant listings of casualty numbers being reported I think it should be important to state casualty doesn’t mean deaths. I have many friends who think when they read the number of casualties it is the amount of people killed. A casualty of war is anyone injured or killed in a war. Not just the amount killed.
muchfrostiness on
Terrible color usage . Percentage is much more relevant
Osstj7737 on
The amount of war crimes committed against Serbia by mostly Austria-Hungary, but also Germany and Bulgaria are some of the worst seen in this war and often get overlooked. Not to mention the war was forced on Serbia and it was one of the few countries that didn’t enter it willingly.
If anyone is curious about this, I suggest you look up the Serbian retreat across Albania, to Greece. It’s one of the reasons why Serbs will always see Greeks as a “brotherly” nation. It’s such a tragic, but inspiring story.
Karma is a bitch though at least, so the whole ordeal costing Austria its precious empire is a great outcome imo
Bearded_Pip on
The world we live in is more a result of World War One than we realize.
Kanelbullah on
The percentage should be of the male between the age of 18-40, and a grim reality appears.
PolyculeButCats on
Damn you Neutrals!
Patient-Reindeer6311 on
415 Samurai
Silent-Laugh5679 on
Romanian corruptuon and incompetence has a long history.
Eldaque on
-How do we call new land we found?
-Hold my grog
the_spolator on
It’s a miracle that Turkiye was able to stand up and fight off the occupying forces after WWI
Rogan_Thoerson on
probably more meaningful to give colors as percentage of the population.
Emotional_Media_479 on
sabetay terör örgütü
More_Particular684 on
Never expected so much death in Portugal since never it was near the frontline
FistOfTheWorstMen on
France got hammered.
KyuuMann on
why so many france ded as percent?
Az1234er on
And almost all of these casualties are men between 16 and 50 (for France / germany / England). So you can multiply it by almost 4 for this specific population
Strong-Amphibian-143 on
Why is Russia the biggest loser in every big war. “ hey guys, run over that hill and absorb some bullets for us, would you?”
karmacarmelon on
These figures are for deaths so the map title should state that rather than “casualties” which could include the injured too.
ElMachoGrande on
How come so many Scandinavians died? We weren’t even part of the war. Fishermen hitting mines?
26 Comments
Damn Turkey got it hard
Would love it , if it was by ethnicity rather than the nation they were fighting for
The contribution for the world wars from British colonies especially India often gets ignored, thankfully the causality image acknowledges it
How often this was reposted?
And how often people wonder about the high death number of Turkey / Ottoman Empire? (-> Armenian genocide)
Personally, casualties expressed as a %age of population is more useful.
Serbia still recovering
Dark Russia tells an even darker story: their refusal to get out of the war was the proximate cause of the Bolshevik Revolution. And think how many corpses **that** eventually led to.
With the current wars going on and constant listings of casualty numbers being reported I think it should be important to state casualty doesn’t mean deaths. I have many friends who think when they read the number of casualties it is the amount of people killed. A casualty of war is anyone injured or killed in a war. Not just the amount killed.
Terrible color usage . Percentage is much more relevant
The amount of war crimes committed against Serbia by mostly Austria-Hungary, but also Germany and Bulgaria are some of the worst seen in this war and often get overlooked. Not to mention the war was forced on Serbia and it was one of the few countries that didn’t enter it willingly.
If anyone is curious about this, I suggest you look up the Serbian retreat across Albania, to Greece. It’s one of the reasons why Serbs will always see Greeks as a “brotherly” nation. It’s such a tragic, but inspiring story.
Karma is a bitch though at least, so the whole ordeal costing Austria its precious empire is a great outcome imo
The world we live in is more a result of World War One than we realize.
The percentage should be of the male between the age of 18-40, and a grim reality appears.
Damn you Neutrals!
415 Samurai
Romanian corruptuon and incompetence has a long history.
-How do we call new land we found?
-Hold my grog
It’s a miracle that Turkiye was able to stand up and fight off the occupying forces after WWI
probably more meaningful to give colors as percentage of the population.
sabetay terör örgütü
Never expected so much death in Portugal since never it was near the frontline
France got hammered.
why so many france ded as percent?
And almost all of these casualties are men between 16 and 50 (for France / germany / England). So you can multiply it by almost 4 for this specific population
Why is Russia the biggest loser in every big war. “ hey guys, run over that hill and absorb some bullets for us, would you?”
These figures are for deaths so the map title should state that rather than “casualties” which could include the injured too.
How come so many Scandinavians died? We weren’t even part of the war. Fishermen hitting mines?