Tags
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Europa
Europe
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Russischer Ãœberfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
Ukrainian Conflict
UkrainianConflict
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News
12 Comments
Acquit this man now please
Interesting to see this case starting on the 20 year anniversary of the Nally incident. We’ll see how the legal system handles self-defence against consistent criminality on farms.
Will be an intriguing case, it sounds like he will know his rights and the laws more than anyone representing him…
Why put Law Professor in the headline? Did the law professor not know that shooting somebody in the back of the head is against the law?
The article seems to indicate that there may be some connection with coursing or badgering.
People selected for the jury were asked to identify themselves if they were involved in coursing, fox coursing or badgering.
Wouldn’t identifying yourself as being involved in any of these be admitting to a crime?
“If they knew anything about Keith Bono Conlon, also known as Keith Green, or about Callum Coleman, also known as Callie Ryan, or about a Robin, or Robert Duggan, with a nickname Rob Minicob, they should not serve, she said. She named four other people and told the jury panel not to serve if they knew any of those.”
How many pseudo-names do the people in this case have?
Whatever about the legal, non-lethal, variants of coursing and fox hunting.
Badgering is definitely illegal, right?
It seems like an odd thing to be asking someone to identify themselves in court for, especially if as
Why is he not a ‘father-of-one’ or is that just some headline-type to describe a working/unemployed class man on trial for homicidal tendencies.
Not guilty. We’ll see.
how could you get away with shooting someone dead in the back of the head?
I know what the verdict would be if this sub sat on the jury
Bang bang