>ISW: Ukrainian F-16 Likely Shot Down Russian Su-34 Fighter Jet
What ISW actually says:
>A Russian milblogger claimed that a Ukrainian F-16 downed a Russian Su-34 fighter aircraft in an unspecified area of the theater on October 12. ISW cannot verify the claim that a Ukrainian F-16 was involved in the reported loss of the Russian Su-34.
Fatalist_m on
UNITED24 at it again… ISW did not say “F-16 Likely Shot Down…”.
What they said is:
>A Russian milblogger claimed that a Ukrainian F-16 downed a Russian Su-34 fighter aircraft in an unspecified area of the theater on October 12. ISW cannot verify the claim that a Ukrainian F-16 was involved in the reported loss of the Russian Su-34.
The only source is a small(12k subscribers) channel without any sort of credibility – vdv_za_chestnost_a_spavedlivost
To be clear the Su-34 was definitely shot down, that was confirmed with relatively credible sources like FIGHTERBOMBER, but we don’t know how it was shot down.
Kon2727 on
I mean it is within perfect range of the AMRAAM if it was fired from within Ukrainian territory. This could entice the Russians to stop dropping the glide bombs since they have to get so close to the border in order to drop them.
Snake_Plizken on
Most likely shot down by anti air. Would be incredibly stupid to tell the Russians what specific systems they have in that area.
Zeub45 on
The rumor comes when the facts are there
angelorsinner on
Budanov: I would be very glad to see this
Barbecued_orc_ribs on
No..no it didn’t.
Very little chance they’re close to the LOC. AIM-120 wouldn’t lock on (f16 radar wouldn’t have the capability that far away).
Most likely crashed due to poor maintenance or not following SOP trying to locate the f16’s itself. Air to air kills aren’t going to be a thing unless they get Gripens with Meteor (and that won’t happen due to escalation management/geopolitics).
F16’s will remain in the rear areas for drone and cruise missile interception, and that’s it.
8 Comments
If so I wonder why ukraine hasn’t confirmed.
The title:
>ISW: Ukrainian F-16 Likely Shot Down Russian Su-34 Fighter Jet
What ISW actually says:
>A Russian milblogger claimed that a Ukrainian F-16 downed a Russian Su-34 fighter aircraft in an unspecified area of the theater on October 12. ISW cannot verify the claim that a Ukrainian F-16 was involved in the reported loss of the Russian Su-34.
UNITED24 at it again… ISW did not say “F-16 Likely Shot Down…”.
What they said is:
>A Russian milblogger claimed that a Ukrainian F-16 downed a Russian Su-34 fighter aircraft in an unspecified area of the theater on October 12. ISW cannot verify the claim that a Ukrainian F-16 was involved in the reported loss of the Russian Su-34.
[https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-october-12-2024](https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-october-12-2024)
The only source is a small(12k subscribers) channel without any sort of credibility – vdv_za_chestnost_a_spavedlivost
To be clear the Su-34 was definitely shot down, that was confirmed with relatively credible sources like FIGHTERBOMBER, but we don’t know how it was shot down.
I mean it is within perfect range of the AMRAAM if it was fired from within Ukrainian territory. This could entice the Russians to stop dropping the glide bombs since they have to get so close to the border in order to drop them.
Most likely shot down by anti air. Would be incredibly stupid to tell the Russians what specific systems they have in that area.
The rumor comes when the facts are there
Budanov: I would be very glad to see this
No..no it didn’t.
Very little chance they’re close to the LOC. AIM-120 wouldn’t lock on (f16 radar wouldn’t have the capability that far away).
Most likely crashed due to poor maintenance or not following SOP trying to locate the f16’s itself. Air to air kills aren’t going to be a thing unless they get Gripens with Meteor (and that won’t happen due to escalation management/geopolitics).
F16’s will remain in the rear areas for drone and cruise missile interception, and that’s it.