Close Menu
    Politics

    Richter Chutkan genehmigt die Veröffentlichung von Trump-Dokumenten vom 6. Januar, die noch vernichtendere Zeugenaussagen enthüllen könnten


    Richter Chutkan genehmigt die Veröffentlichung von Trump-Dokumenten vom 6. Januar, die noch vernichtendere Zeugenaussagen enthüllen könnten

    https://www.salon.com/2024/10/11/chutkan-approves-release-of-jan-6-documents-that-could-reveal-more-damning-testimony/

    View 25 Comments

    25 Comments

    2. ExoticEmployment8558 on

      What’s the over-under on Trump calling her the N word on a weekend Truth Social rant? I mean it’s not like he’d lose support from his base.

    3. Newscast_Now on

      Media has not covered this stuff as much as it covered ‘but her emails’ in 2016.

    4. zombienugget on

      I don’t see how this guy can get any more damned when the damning never damns him

    5. autotldr on

      This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://www.salon.com/2024/10/11/chutkan-approves-release-of-jan-6-documents-that-could-reveal-more-damning-testimony/) reduced by 72%. (I’m a bot)
      *****
      > Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, the federal judge overseeing Donald Trump's Jan. 6 case, issued an order Thursday approving the release of redacted source documents that provided special counsel Jack Smith with potentially incriminating material on the former president's attempts to overturn the 2020 election.

      > Trump now has a seven-day window to challenge the release of papers, which could further incriminate him in the public eye as the 2024 election enters its closing stretch.

      > The documents consist of a four-part appendix listing the sources of the quotes Smith used in his brief, as well as information detailing the legal pathways to prosecuting Trump even after the Supreme Court ruled that he was immune from criminal prosecution for official acts.

      *****
      [**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/1g1j6y2/judge_chutkan_approves_release_of_trump_jan_6/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ “Version 2.02, ~694923 tl;drs so far.”) | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr “PM’s and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome.”) | *Top* *keywords*: **Trump**^#1 **election**^#2 **case**^#3 **legal**^#4 **documents**^#5

    6. Slow_Investment_2211 on

      I don’t understand why she even gave Trump yet more delay time

    7. prestocoffee on

      It will not sway his voters. It just won’t. They’re so lost to him they don’t care.

    9. Able_Ad_458 on

      I’ve become so indifferent to the word “damning” anymore. I can’t keep track of how many “damning” things have been released about Trump, and the man still has a legitimate shot at becoming the President again. Nothing seems “damning” enough where he is concerned. Nothing.

    10. whatlineisitanyway on

      Comey saying he reopened the email investigation likely cost Clinton the election. Yet no matter how damaging this testimony and evidence is it will barely move the needle. This country is in so much trouble.

    11. Old_Court9173 on

      She is an amazing judge and I love her in her role as Linda in The Bear!

    13. HMWastedDays on

      Of course Trump would be happy about this, right? Now everyone can see how he is innocent. /s

    17. codacoda74 on

      Misleading headline: judge didn’t grant release, judge granted item to docket. It’s not appealable.
      Judge is 🔥🔥🔥

    18. WackyBones510 on

      Can’t wait to see whether Americans want to have an apple or a hand grenade as a snack in a few weeks.

    20. PJA0307 on

      While I’m all for this, the sad thing is that it won’t change any of his voters minds. They’re so far brainwashed, everything negative is just fake and made up.

    22. wes1971 on

      He’s a money maker for network television. Why would they want him to go away?

    Leave A Reply