Tags
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Europa
Europe
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
Ukrainian Conflict
UkrainianConflict
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News
5 Comments
SS:
[From X:](https://x.com/AaronSiriSG/status/1844546217163854079)
> The difference between a drug and a vaccine?
>
> It was just announced GSK “will pay up to $2.2 billion to settle roughly 80,000 state court cases claiming Zantac [a heartburn drug] … caused them to develop cancer.”
>
> If Zantac were, however, a childhood vaccine (such as GSK’s Hep B vaccine, Tdap vaccine, flu shot, MMR vaccine, etc.) there would be no $2.2 billion payment and this product would still be considered safe and effective. Why? Because the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 gave GSK immunity for design defect claims and direct failure to warn claims for injuries caused by its childhood vaccines. Caveat emptor. https://law360.com/classaction/articles/1888571?copied=1
I believe that Republicans were trying to allow more innovation and development with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act but it ended up causing problems decades later with Covid.
the only way to make vaccines effective is to include elements that would cause your body harm for it to have the immunity response thats intended, like mercury for example. vaccines by nature are harmful. and that is the very basis on why these companies got the immunity, otherwise they wouldnt have bothered to make these and risk these settlements which are to be expected. who would? lol
if there really is a lethal catastrophic pandemic, is it not worth sacrificing the extreme few whod have a negative reaction from it vs the vast majority getting infected and dying from it leading to the end of the country? but people being people, thankfully gullible though, they can just lie to their faces and say its perfectly effective and safe.
from the perspective of authority, which is more important… the supposed right of the individual or their own safety and the continuity of the country.
but two things can also happen. the individual is a moron and has become the very threat or that the threat is a lie and is just another scheme to make money and you risk your life for nothing.
when you have politicians, who have their own layers of immunity, who have stakes in the very companies that make these and profit from it… maybe its not so stupid to acknowledge that maybe your wellbeing isnt necessarily their top priority.
I will probably get downvoted to oblivion for this one BUT it must be said:
There is still an adverse effects vaccine compensation program https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation
There is no money in cure and prevention and this is the only way governments can encourage companies to develops vaccines and of course fully funding said vaccine programs. This is probably one of the most absurb conspiracies I have seen and will end up costing us an immense number of lives, it already has brought back measles etc… diseases we had eradicated!
Decided that if a manufacturer demands a shield from liability for their products, there’s a damn good chance the product isn’t safe and should be avoided.