Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris said in an interview aired on Oct. 7 that if she is elected, she would refuse to engage in peace talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin without Ukraine’s involvement.
“Not bilaterally without Ukraine, no. Ukraine must have a say in the future of Ukraine,” Harris told CBS’s “60 Minutes” when asked if she would consider negotiating one-on-one with Putin to end the war.
The Biden administration has similarly ruled out discussions with Putin, and Harris criticized former President Donald Trump’s approach to the Ukraine crisis, calling his policies a surrender to Russia’s invasion.
bokkser on
Unlike Trump, who would meet with Putin inside Ukraine
wish1977 on
Only someone like Trump would think that something like that is acceptable.
Horror-Layer-8178 on
It is their war
Nebulanibbler on
Shouldn’t Biden be the one to see him if any
waynep712222 on
Both Putin and the Saudi crown prince have poison hand shake rings.
Not safe to shake eithers hands.
BringBackApollo2023 on
Trump says he’ll only participate if Zelenskyy and him are on their knees in front of Putin.
Last-Juggernaut4664 on
Good. It’s getting really annoying how all these large countries keep trying to negotiate “peace” with Russia unsolicited and without Ukraine’s input or participation. They’re only grandstanding and don’t actually care about resolving the issue or the people of Ukraine.
Puzzleheaded_Sail559 on
Why would she? Russia isn’t at war with the US.
Eau-Shitake on
Will Trump agree to giving recently formerly Ukrainian land to Russia?
I think so.
Do you?
GodrickTheGoof on
Fuck yeah. No one should give the time of day to that psycho unless he is ready to stop with the Ukraine shit.
Aldo_Raine_2020 on
KAMMY HAS CAJONES
Strong_Remove_2976 on
It’s vital the US and wider west treat any negotiations in this way.
The one thing Russia will want most is the end to sanctions, which are not Ukraine’s measure
The west must hold the line and say to Russia ‘our decisions on sanctions will be guided by what you agree with Ukraine bilaterally’. They absolutely cannot blend the two negotiation tracks
wyrms1gn on
trump will just bend over for putin. he was the weakest president weve ever had on diplomacy – ever
GenesisCorrupted on
Well it wouldn’t really be a truce talk without the other party there, would it?
Lucky-Hunter-Dude on
I don’t imagine Putin would have any need to meet with her at all.
Belgrade111 on
she can say whatever she wants, but the Russians and Putin are on an inexorable march to victory,,,The world is largely on the Russian side,,,except for the West and their satellites in Asia,,,Japan and South Korea,,,,no one is imposed sanctions on Russia,,,The world is changing a lot
17 Comments
Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris said in an interview aired on Oct. 7 that if she is elected, she would refuse to engage in peace talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin without Ukraine’s involvement.
“Not bilaterally without Ukraine, no. Ukraine must have a say in the future of Ukraine,” Harris told CBS’s “60 Minutes” when asked if she would consider negotiating one-on-one with Putin to end the war.
The Biden administration has similarly ruled out discussions with Putin, and Harris criticized former President Donald Trump’s approach to the Ukraine crisis, calling his policies a surrender to Russia’s invasion.
Unlike Trump, who would meet with Putin inside Ukraine
Only someone like Trump would think that something like that is acceptable.
It is their war
Shouldn’t Biden be the one to see him if any
Both Putin and the Saudi crown prince have poison hand shake rings.
Not safe to shake eithers hands.
Trump says he’ll only participate if Zelenskyy and him are on their knees in front of Putin.
Good. It’s getting really annoying how all these large countries keep trying to negotiate “peace” with Russia unsolicited and without Ukraine’s input or participation. They’re only grandstanding and don’t actually care about resolving the issue or the people of Ukraine.
Why would she? Russia isn’t at war with the US.
Will Trump agree to giving recently formerly Ukrainian land to Russia?
I think so.
Do you?
Fuck yeah. No one should give the time of day to that psycho unless he is ready to stop with the Ukraine shit.
KAMMY HAS CAJONES
It’s vital the US and wider west treat any negotiations in this way.
The one thing Russia will want most is the end to sanctions, which are not Ukraine’s measure
The west must hold the line and say to Russia ‘our decisions on sanctions will be guided by what you agree with Ukraine bilaterally’. They absolutely cannot blend the two negotiation tracks
trump will just bend over for putin. he was the weakest president weve ever had on diplomacy – ever
Well it wouldn’t really be a truce talk without the other party there, would it?
I don’t imagine Putin would have any need to meet with her at all.
she can say whatever she wants, but the Russians and Putin are on an inexorable march to victory,,,The world is largely on the Russian side,,,except for the West and their satellites in Asia,,,Japan and South Korea,,,,no one is imposed sanctions on Russia,,,The world is changing a lot