Close Menu
    Daten

    [OC] Wie der US-Kongress über HR9747 abstimmte, das die Erweiterung des FEMA-Katastrophenhilfefonds beinhaltete

    [OC] Wie der US-Kongress über HR9747 abstimmte, das die Erweiterung des FEMA-Katastrophenhilfefonds beinhaltete

    Von false_friends

    View 16 Comments

    16 Comments

    2. zgrizz on

      This, like so many bills, is deceptively named.

      It was actually a continuing resolution and contained, in addition to FEMA,

      several public health programs,
      various programs and authorities related to veterans,
      the National Flood Insurance Program,
      the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program,
      the Food for Peace program,
      the authorities of the U.S. Parole Commission,
      the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) National Cybersecurity Protection System,
      authorities for DHS and the Department of Justice to take certain actions to mitigate a credible threat from an unmanned aircraft system,
      several Department of Agriculture programs and authorities,
      the Department of Defense’s authority to use funds for certain military construction projects, and
      authorities for sanctions related to human rights abuses in Hong Kong.

      So in your data set if someone is opposed to any one of these additional programs they are ‘bad’, because they said no?

      Bad data is bad data. Good data presented deceptively is worse data.

    3. jumpdmc on

      If you’re a Democrat and you’re looking at this thinking “fuck em” that’s exactly how Republican representatives want you to think.

      They want to divide the country, don’t let them.

    5. ScreamThyLastScream on

      I just want to say this first map really shows you something different about the data. Maps with landmass area are deceptive in significance of effect on the overall outcome. A small dot on many places on this map could be as many people as an entire large square. Also why we have more than just the Senate, but I digress this is about data representation and you can see the problem.

    7. KP_Wrath on

      That chunk of red in Florida seems to be rather similar in area to the cone of uncertainty for Milton.

    9. Randomhero360 on

      An all of them who voted no will cry FEMA didn’t, do enough, or help at all, or some twisted headline BS. They will side step the blame as always with 0 accountability for their action, and the voters do nothing about it.

    11. Gnarledhalo on

      This was the bill that prevented the government to shut down on Oct. 1 2024, for those that didn’t know.

    12. DARKSTAIN on

      You got to be kidding me. You live in FL in the most natural disaster prone state, and you vote NOOn something that will certainly help you one day. How dumb are these people.

    13. Uncle_Hephaestus on

      those central states will change their tune when Yellowstone goes

    14. TheHermit__IX on

      All of those republicans in the path of the hurricane voting no. They don’t give a fuck about their constituents.

    15. aelric22 on

      That one county in California’s central valley that forgets that they live IN California.

    16. LurkersUniteAgain on

      very surprised someone in norther Carolina, western north carolina too, voted no on this

    Leave A Reply