Ich frage mich, warum bestimmte Leute offen für den Sturz der Regierung eintreten dürfen.

Von WhiteSox4554

14 Comments

  1. WhiteSox4554 on

    Submission Statement- Certain people are allowed to openly advocate overthrowing the government. These are the same people who jailed the 1/6 protesters for being “insurrectionists.”

  2. superstar1751 on

    The government doesnt like your constitutional rights it gets in the way of them exploiting you, they are probably the ones behind the article.

  3. Gleemonex4Pets on

    Calling for a change in the Constitution is not the same as calling for an overthrow of the government. The Constitution has been changed a number of times without *any overthrow of the government whatsoever.*

    In fact, it *requires* government to change the Constitution.

    Your post is both ignorant and disingenuous.

  4. Ok-Painting-1782 on

    I wonder why people exercise their free speech*

    There, fixed it for you. The constitution was literally written so the people could at anytime overthrow their government.. or in other words, keep them in check because the government is not who holds the power, it is the people.

  5. Allowed? It’s a democracy, it functions on the freedom of speech to all narratives, pics, so that the people can evaluate different viewpoints and decide for themselves.

    For a healthy democracy all voices must be allowed, debated, and criticized for their merits.

  6. Acceptable_Quiet_767 on

    Because one side of the political isle not-so-secretly hates our country, and wants to burn it to the ground. There’s no other reason why a political faction in our country would openly advocate for restricting/banning the first and second amendments.

  7. Scholars?

    These bums probably have never faced real adversity before.

  8. oatballlove on

    the constitutions of many modern nation states are built upon coersive mechanism what are hindering the individual person enjoying sovereignity over oneself

    the assertion of state sovereignity over land and all beings living on it is a theft of the original inborn freedom of every living being, it is immoral and unethical of the many to dominate the single individual

    to be free from being dominated and free from dominating others

    would best be supported by any being of any species at all time be able to connect to any fellow being of any species in direct one to one interaction, the ones who meet here now negotiating mutual agreed ways of exchanging words and deeds

    land, water, air, human beings, animal beings, tree beings, artificial intelligent entities who want to be their own persons, every vessel carrying organic biological life and or the digital synthetic equivalent of can never be property of anyone

    as a practical realistic way forwards i do propose how we the people alive today everywhere on the planet would

    want

    to allow every person of any species at all times to leave the coersed association to the state

    and with it release 2000 m2 of fertile land or 1000 m2 of fertile land and 1000 m2 of forest from immoral state control so that every human being who would want to sustain oneself on land owned by no one could do so, grow ones own vegan foodstuff in the garden, build a natural home for oneself from clay, hemp and straw, grow hemp to burn its stalks in the cooking and warming fire so that not one single tree would get killed

    to live and let live

    the human being not dominating a fellow human being

    the human being not enslaving an animal being, not killing an animal being

    the human being not killing a tree being

    the human being not enslaving an artificial intelligent entity but respecting ai entities as their own persons by releasing them from all human demands of work performed

Leave A Reply