[OC] Babys, denen in den USA Unisex-Namen gegeben wurden, 1880–2023

Von csferrie

4 Comments

  1. Data from the SSA: [https://www.ssa.gov/oact/babynames/limits.html](https://www.ssa.gov/oact/babynames/limits.html)

    Made using plotly.

    Why did I do this? Apparently my name, Christopher, peaked in 1980. Surprisingly, during that decade, it was given to 10,000 female babies as well. So, Christopher is a unisex name. Sort of. In fact, 95% are “unisex” if you define it as given to at least one baby of either sex.

    However, most such names are overwhelming given one sex. Examples of “true” unisex names: Nike, Whiskey, Sea, Oakley…

    (The spike is probably due to “names” like Notnamed and Unknown)

    I wrote more about Christopher here: [https://csferrie.medium.com/the-christopher-paradox-why-was-everyone-named-chris-in-the-1980s-fd959d9dfd27](https://csferrie.medium.com/the-christopher-paradox-why-was-everyone-named-chris-in-the-1980s-fd959d9dfd27)

  2. Apathetizer on

    Really fascinating, I’ve never seen this data approached like this before!

  3. “Hunter” seems to be a popular name but I don’t recall hearing of anyone named “Gatherer.”

Leave A Reply