Zwei Bilder im Abstand von zwei Tagen fangen den natürlichen Lebenszyklus großer Projekte in Irland perfekt ein.

https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1fv3sn0

Von Accomplished-Ad-6639

28 Comments

  1. “What’s today’s protest mary?”

    “Not sure Tom, but sure I said I’d get out of the house since the weather is nice”

    “Ah yeah, how are the kids ?”

    “They’re grand now, Colm has a new girlfriend”

    “Lovely, anyway, I’m off , I’ll be back next week to give out about planning permission, if the weather is nice”

  2. I don’t think I’ve ever seen so many Karen-shaped heads in one photo.

    Nearly every single one of them the quintessential Karen.

  3. SirJoePininfarina on

    We have a major problem with our attitude to change in this country. Literally nothing worth doing is unopposed, there’s this assumption that change is bad but the same people complain nothing ever changes.

    Anywhere that’s consistently improving things for their citizens does so by assuming change is good and embracing it. Trying out new power sources, trying out new infrastructure, using technology to solve problems.

    Whereas this shower of numbskulls are opposing a FUCKING BATTERY simply existing near them.

  4. “Stop that thing we have no idea about” – drives a car with loads of things they have no idea about, uses electricity delivered by tech they have no idea about, uses a phone with software they have no idea about, eats food they have idea what is in it, takes medicine they have no idea about, goes to doctors giving advice they have no idea about. It’s baffling how many people are proud to say they are against stuff they just don’t know anything about. If their position was “we want to preserve green areas” I could get it or if they were saying protect some endangered animal, sure but their suggestion here is just that is “untested”. What the fuck do they want? Scientific papers? There are loads of papers providing more than enough info to prove that these batteries are cost effective at storing power with the downside that they can’t discharge quickly, that’s it. No safety concerns from any peer reviewed papers, no environmental or safety concerns. I really hate this shit.

  5. ThatGuy98_ on

    This is what happens when you make everybody’s opinion equally valid.

  6. nut-budder on

    You know I have a bit of sympathy for people who go all NIMBY on things that are genuinely big visual changes like a massive windfarm or a skyscraper. I get that the disruption of seeing a dramatic change in the landscape you’re used to is hard for some people to deal with. I disagree but I can empathise.

    This however is just pure twattery. Fear of something you don’t understand and basing your opinion on whatever conspiratorial lunatic you can find to back you up.

  7. I’d love to hear that dogs opinion on large infrastructure changes in the area

  8. JealousInevitable544 on

    How do we know the dog is opposed?

    It looks like he’s being held there against his will.

  9. Aah yes, putting kids in the front for emotional blackmail. Jaysus, nothing will ever change in this country.

  10. Apprehensive_Ratio80 on

    Half the people in that photo are children ffs when did it become popular to bring your kids to protests 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

    Anyway you factor out the children who probably have no idea what they are doing there and certainly no idea about dangers or lack thereof of energy storage and you have about a dozen ppl so nothing major to worry about

  11. AsanteSane on

    I’m from Buncrana and this place has a serious problem of people just wanting absolutely nothing to change or improve but then continue to complain about the town not getting any business or development opportunities

  12. Table_Shim on

    Two thoughts

    1. Nimbyism is an unwanted effect of a very positive thing, full rights to publicly declare opinions on development.
    – You do not want the opposite of this in the same way you don’t want the country choked with effective nimby campaigns.

    2. Lodging submissions on proposed developments does not automatically mean anything, be it an extension or a battery facility, will be denied. They have to find valid environmental or planning procedure mishaps for their rationale

  13. Own-Beach3238 on

    Everyone of them including most of the kids most likely a battery in their pocket 🤖

  14. Iron-air batteries are actually safer than other types of batteries. No/very low risk of fire, non-toxic, no risk of overcharging etc. It’s still early days for iron-air batteries but everything points to them being very safe and well suited for grid-energy storage of intermittent energy sources like wind or solar.

    It’s funny because traditional battery storage are more dangerous than iron-air batteries if something goes wrong. These are probably the same people who think 5g cell towers cause cancer.

  15. Content-Carrot1833 on

    State of them dragging their kids out for the photo op. Pure fucking gowls.

  16. >Key Concerns:
    * Potential harmful radiation
    * Contamination and pollution of local streams that our animals rely on
    * Destruction of wildlife habitats in the forestry area planned for deforestation
    * Devaluation of our homes and land

    Radiation? If people are concerned about being a few kilometers away from a non-ionising EMF source they should rip the wiring out of their homes.
    As for the environment thing, they’re felling commercial Sitka to build this… and the site is also 1km from a large quarry. They probably should be protesting that too.

  17. garygunning1984 on

    Not saying it’s right but you look at the high speed rail infrastructure china has put in place recently and they just plough through

  18. Birdinhandandbush on

    Simple solution.

    We pull all electrical cables out of Buncrana. We pull all 3G/4G masts and do not install 5G (god forbid).

    “No future energy storage systems” has to be the most fucking backwards bonkers statement I’ve seen in a long time.

    Back to the stone age with ye fucking muck donkeys.

  19. Missing one that says council rejects because it will change the neighborhood’s characteristics

  20. scannerdarkley on

    If these people had a voice as loud as this, back in the day, we’d have no:

    * **Electricity:** “power lines are dangerous, heavy electricity falls out of lines and kills people”

    * **Internet:** “the modem noises are satanic”

    * **Mobile phones:** “~~2G/3G/4G/~~ 5G masts are emitting radiation”

    * **Batteries:** “We don’t want them, because….reasons”. All while ignoring all the batteries in their phones, laptops, cars even the airpods attached to their stupid faces.

    These people would burn themselves to death if they heard that Fire Alarms have radioactive elements in them.

Leave A Reply