Close Menu
    Politics

    „Machen Sie sie zum Aufruhr“ – Trumps Wahlrichter entsiegelt den Antrag eines Sonderermittlers zur Immunität


    „Machen Sie sie zum Aufruhr“ – Trumps Wahlrichter entsiegelt den Antrag eines Sonderermittlers zur Immunität

    https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/02/trump-special-counsel-evidence-election-harris.html

    View 39 Comments

    39 Comments

    1. ikariusrb on

      The article doesn’t appear to have much of any content, but good lord I hope “Make them riot” is a quote they’ve got documentation of from Trump.

    4. 9mac on

      Trump attempted a coup against the country, nothing less. He should be facing a lot more than jail time for his treason.

    7. Exciting_Teacher6258 on

      When does it end, folks? When do we say enough is enough?

    8. AcademicPublius on

      The “riot” in question–this is in Michigan. A campaign employee receives word that there’s going to be a Brooks Brothers-type riot in relation to that vote problem, and says that they should “do it”.

      More stuff in there. Probably the most notable point is that they have evidence of the plot having started **before the 2020 election**. It was always the plan to cheat.

    9. moreesq on

      We can’t expect much from this filing in terms of dissuading wavering Trump voters. However, Trump and team will have to pay money and attention to this filing, and that bleeds their funds from getting out the vote. Second, the stable genius will show himself to be even more a volatile knucklehead in his hyper ventilating responses to this publicity.

    11. Red_Wing-GrimThug on

      Trump keeps talking and talking about “BANANA REPUBLIC”, hes the one, the big Monkey trying to ruin this country.

    12. LlanviewOLTL on

      This is what we were concerned about during last night’s debate – where’s the firewall this time? Last time at least there was Pence. Now he’s got nothing but young MAGA lunatics. Vance isn’t gonna do anything. Johnson definitely isn’t gonna do anything. This is why we *can’t* have Trump win again. These people are serious.

    14. NoFunHere on

      I don’t agree with Pence on social issues but he may have been the only adult in the room during the presidency.

    15. Dead_Cash_Burn on

      Checking calendar… Yup, it’s October. Is this the October surprise? Maybe?

    17. Agondonter on

      According to the article:

      “When the colleague suggested that there was about to be unrest reminiscent of the Brooks Brothers Riot” during the Florida vote count in the 2000 election, **the campaign employee “responded ‘Make them riot**’ and ‘Do it!!!,’ ” the motion alleges.

    18. MeetingKey4598 on

      Really comprehensive document. I’m sure a lot of redacted can be inferred.

      Trump interacted directly with basically everyone in this doc and there are a lot of them. Trump knew he lost, knew that even if there were cases of fraud identified it wouldn’t change the outcome, and that Congress didn’t have the authority to reverse the results of the election.

      All the way up to Jan 6th when he gave his speech he knew it was all a lie.

      That anyone would vote for him is an embarrassment. Fox News, Newsmax, OANN are all counting on Republican voters to never read this or be unable to read this.

    19. sarcago on

      I’d love for literally anything to happen but at this point I’m expecting nothing to change and a repeat of 2020 all over again with an angry mob and fake electors (or some other insidious scheme).

    20. SchemeWorth6105 on

      Yeah no wonder he dropped out of 60 minutes lol, and forget another debate. He knew this was coming.

    21. Skorpyos on

      > If Trump wins the election, he will have the power to order the Department of Justice to dismiss the criminal case against him.

      This is the only reason he’s running.

    22. Worried_Quarter469 on

      Four days later, Pence in another private lunch allegedly tried to urge Trump to accept the election results and run again in 2024.

      Trump responded, “I don’t know, 2024 is so far off,” according to the filing.

    23. FirstSonOfGwyn on

      I usually try to at least scan these as part of my civic duty… but dang 165 pages is a lot. I’ll see how far I can get….

      otherwise… Taps foot until Legal Eagle has a 30min summary I can listen to…

    24. TheUpperHand on

      >Yeah, but he said “peaceful” that one time, so all of this is fake.

      – MAGA

    25. mexisol187 on

      “So basically, they’re saying Trump went rogue and acted as a private citizen trying to pull every trick in the book to overturn the election results, and now he’s trying to hide behind ‘presidential immunity.’ Honestly, it’s wild how detailed this is—targeting seven states, pressuring Pence, throwing around all these false claims. Feels like they’re saying, ‘Dude, you crossed the line from President to candidate desperate to keep power, and that’s not covered by your job.’ This is going to be one hell of a trial if it gets that far.”

    26. Caerris1 on

      If Kamala can seize on this properly, Trump loses the election. People who don’t pay much attention to politics will be reminded, on October, exactly the role Trump played on Jan 6th and in other instances.

      This is just after JD Vance refused to answer if Trump lost the election.

      This could really be that big.

    27. coffeeandtrout on

      “The defendant asserts that he is immune from prosecution for his criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 presidential election because, he claims, it entailed official conduct. Not so,” Smith’s office said in the filing.”

      I’m glad Smith is the Special Prosecutor. Having to deal both with the DOJ’s waiting and the Supreme Court’s interpretation of immunity (forgot about “judge” Cannon, another stooge) he’s been hampered by, but is still a goddamn honey badger.

    29. Rude-Expression-8893 on

      If his supporters want a dictatorship so badly, they can just ask their Daddy Putin to annex their states

    31. Silvaski1 on

      Page 143:

      ““[w]e had an election that was stolen from us.” 666”

      That footnote reference number seems very apt!

    33. ImTooOldForSchool on

      Pence is definitely a witness, his name is all over this report including private lunches he held with Trump after the election telling him it was over

    34. cheezhead1252 on

      This comes right off the heels of Trump suddenly withdrawing from the 60 minutes interview.

    35. Secure-Quiet3067 on

      Why aren’t more comments about what Judge Chuntan just unsealed to the public about Trump’s Jan. 6? I do wanna hear what you think about; will this affect the election outcome? Why isn’t he being charged with murder & premeditation for Jan 6?

    36. Autoxquattro on

      Ohh, is that what vance meant by “peaceful transfer of power “?

    37. Objective_Regret2768 on

      Yet, this dipshit is running for president again four years later

    38. Transhumanistgamer on

      Wow that judge does not dillydally. It was only like 2 days ago Smith asked for the motion to be unsealed.

    Leave A Reply