Der Iran ist nicht bereit für einen Krieg mit Israel

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2024/10/iran-israel-war-lebanon/680114/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=the-atlantic&utm_content=edit-promo

6 Comments

  1. theatlantic on

    Arash Azizi: “Iran’s attack on Israel yesterday evoked a sense of déjà vu. On April 13, too, Iran targeted Israel with hundreds of missiles and drones—at that time marking a first-ever in the history of the two countries. The latest strikes were notably similar: more show than effect, resulting in few casualties (April’s injured only a young Arab Israeli girl, and today’s killed a Palestinian worker in Jericho, in the West Bank). No Israeli civilians were hurt in either attack, although it’s likely that Iran’s use of more sophisticated missiles brought about greater damage this time. [https://theatln.tc/7AUzVCy3](https://theatln.tc/7AUzVCy3

    “Now, as then, my sources suggest that Iran has no appetite for getting into a war and hopes for this to be the end of hostilities. And yet, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei decided to take the risk. In the past month, Iran has had to watch while Israel made quick work of destroying Hezbollah’s command structure and killed its leader, Hassan Nasrallah. Tehran was fast losing face, and Khamenei apparently made up his mind to shore up his anti-Israel credibility. History will show how consequential this decision was.

    “Shortly after the missile barrage, Benjamin Netanyahu publicly announced that Iran had made a ‘big mistake’ and would ‘pay for it.’ Israel’s dedicated X account echoed this threat in Persian. Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett called on Netanyahu to attack Iran’s nuclear and energy sites, claiming that this could lead Iranians to rise up and bring down their regime at last. Israel has had no better chance in half a century to change the region fundamentally, Bennett said.

    “This is a terrifying moment for Iran. Khamenei has long pursued what he calls a ‘no peace, no war’ strategy: Iran supports regional militias opposed to Western interests and the Jewish state but avoids actually getting into a war. The approach was always untenable. But Iran is not ready for an all-out war: Its economically battered society does not share its leaders’ animus toward Israel, and its military capabilities don’t even begin to match Israel’s sophisticated arsenal. Iran lacks significant air-defense capabilities on its own, and Russia has not leapt to complement them.

    Read more: [https://theatln.tc/7AUzVCy3](https://theatln.tc/7AUzVCy3)

  2. aWhiteWildLion on

    Iran’s attack on Israel looked more like a desperate attempt to save Iran’s face and honor after the humiliations they received during the last two weeks. Now Israel finally has the justification they needed to strike Iran’s oil and gas industry, maybe even their nuclear sites.

  3. Puzzleheaded-Ad-2982 on

    Destroying Iran’s military capabilities may also serve to put a dent in Russia’s drone warfare strategy. One can hope, anyway.

  4. Blowing up the Theocracy in Iran is by far the best strategic move that the collective West can do right now, especially if it manages to have Israel do the rough part.
    You’re de facto getting rid of much of the anti-west platform in ME, and of the 3rd main actor of the anti west alliance (China and Russia being the main parts, ofc).
    It’s 20+ years that the West hasn’t had a similar oppurtunity to tip the scales of global power in his favour.
    I’m kinda sure it will try to seize it, with US at the helm and Israel doing the “bad guy” part.

    I’m extremely sorry for every middle eastern who will end up caught in the crossfire.
    Hang tight!

  5. Extreme-General1323 on

    Iran would get smoked in any war – just like the entire Iraqi military was decimated in about one hour in Desert Storm.

Leave A Reply