>barring UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres from entering the country for his failure to “unequivocally condemn” Iran’s massive missile attack on Israel.
Guterres is a terror supporting clown at this point honestly
Dofolo on
The friend of my enemy is not my friend, seems fair enough.
Such_Lobster1426 on
Guterres will claim that he had no idea Iran attacked Israel.
The same way Lazzarini said he had no idea UNRWA employed a Hamas leader. After he was told multiple times.
Deepwithdeepthoughts on
Banning an enemy’s friend is a good idea
when_beep_and_flash on
He wouldn’t go to Israel. He’ll stay in New York drinking wine with sheikhs and commissars after another successful day calling for ceasefire on behalf of terrorists.
INVADER_BZZ on
I don’t remember any other UN Secretary, that has been as obviously biased, irrelevant and actually damaging for UN image (if it’s even possible anymore) as this clown. At least i don’t remember one like this one from the last 30 years.
theshynik on
Wonder, why he goes to Israel, no to Iran.
Why he do nothing regarding 101 civilian israelian hostages
Why why
Halunner-0815 on
I don’t think that’s wise, but I can fully understand the sentiment. Guterres repeatedly failed to condemn the terror attacks and the tactics of Hamas and Hezbollah. His neutrality is.more than doubtful.
Darkone539 on
Honestly, seems fair. If Israel had done this they would be condemned.
The un needs to keep states on side, but walking that line has gone too far into appeasement. An attack is an attack.
Badbrains8 on
This guy has been extremely bias since the start of the conflict. Surprised he wasn’t banned a long time ago
Altruistic-Key-369 on
Wars and sanctions have happened for less, wtf.
Dint destroy the credibility of the UN so publically. Jesus the west is losing its god damn mind..
gideonboxer on
Tell me he’s on Iran’s payroll, without telling me he’s on Iran’s payroll.
EntropyDenied on
Good, why would they allow members of an Jew hating organization into their country
Direct_Alternative94 on
You see, Israel would prefer to keep the terrorists and their sympathizers from entering Israel.
sheeplectric on
Here’s the thing though. “Unequivocal” condemnation of Iran would diminish the 100+ years leading up to this moment. Nobody is innocent here, but Israel has been provocative, not just in the last few days, but for over a century in the Middle East.
None of this is happening in isolation, and Israel is not simply an innocent victim of an unprovoked attack.
None of this is to say that attacking civilians is acceptable, but that understanding the true state of things requires a critical analysis of history, not just “Iran bad Israel good”.
WereInbuisness on
Good for Israel. The UN Sec. General is fully complicit in his knowledge of Hamas and UNWRA. Moreover, he didn’t condemn Iran’s “show of force attack.”
That man is the ultimate fence sitter on most things, but when it comes to Israel, it’s obvious he is biased against them. It’s truly ridiculous.
Pristine_Toe_7379 on
Now why would Israel allow an openly hostile Iranian junior ayatollah into the country?
The_Phaedron on
> “A Secretary-General who gives backing to terrorists, rapists, and murderers from Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and now Iran—the mothership of global terror—will be remembered as a stain on the history of the UN.” [Said Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz]
A stain on the history of the UN? It’d be like picking out a stain on a toddler’s lunch bib.
razzinos on
He can ask his hamas friends to smuggle him
Namer_HaKeseph on
This clown had no problem condemning the attacks on Lebanon, but he suddenly can find the words when Iran attacks Israel unprovoked.
26 Comments
>barring UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres from entering the country for his failure to “unequivocally condemn” Iran’s massive missile attack on Israel.
Guterres is a terror supporting clown at this point honestly
The friend of my enemy is not my friend, seems fair enough.
Guterres will claim that he had no idea Iran attacked Israel.
The same way Lazzarini said he had no idea UNRWA employed a Hamas leader. After he was told multiple times.
Banning an enemy’s friend is a good idea
He wouldn’t go to Israel. He’ll stay in New York drinking wine with sheikhs and commissars after another successful day calling for ceasefire on behalf of terrorists.
I don’t remember any other UN Secretary, that has been as obviously biased, irrelevant and actually damaging for UN image (if it’s even possible anymore) as this clown. At least i don’t remember one like this one from the last 30 years.
Wonder, why he goes to Israel, no to Iran.
Why he do nothing regarding 101 civilian israelian hostages
Why why
I don’t think that’s wise, but I can fully understand the sentiment. Guterres repeatedly failed to condemn the terror attacks and the tactics of Hamas and Hezbollah. His neutrality is.more than doubtful.
Honestly, seems fair. If Israel had done this they would be condemned.
The un needs to keep states on side, but walking that line has gone too far into appeasement. An attack is an attack.
This guy has been extremely bias since the start of the conflict. Surprised he wasn’t banned a long time ago
Wars and sanctions have happened for less, wtf.
Dint destroy the credibility of the UN so publically. Jesus the west is losing its god damn mind..
Tell me he’s on Iran’s payroll, without telling me he’s on Iran’s payroll.
Good, why would they allow members of an Jew hating organization into their country
You see, Israel would prefer to keep the terrorists and their sympathizers from entering Israel.
Here’s the thing though. “Unequivocal” condemnation of Iran would diminish the 100+ years leading up to this moment. Nobody is innocent here, but Israel has been provocative, not just in the last few days, but for over a century in the Middle East.
None of this is happening in isolation, and Israel is not simply an innocent victim of an unprovoked attack.
None of this is to say that attacking civilians is acceptable, but that understanding the true state of things requires a critical analysis of history, not just “Iran bad Israel good”.
Good for Israel. The UN Sec. General is fully complicit in his knowledge of Hamas and UNWRA. Moreover, he didn’t condemn Iran’s “show of force attack.”
That man is the ultimate fence sitter on most things, but when it comes to Israel, it’s obvious he is biased against them. It’s truly ridiculous.
Now why would Israel allow an openly hostile Iranian junior ayatollah into the country?
> “A Secretary-General who gives backing to terrorists, rapists, and murderers from Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and now Iran—the mothership of global terror—will be remembered as a stain on the history of the UN.” [Said Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz]
A stain on the history of the UN? It’d be like picking out a stain on a toddler’s lunch bib.
He can ask his hamas friends to smuggle him
This clown had no problem condemning the attacks on Lebanon, but he suddenly can find the words when Iran attacks Israel unprovoked.
He should resign now.
https://i.imgur.com/dMQU38q.jpeg
[***UN***involved in peace](https://preview.redd.it/what-would-a-un-peacekeeper-build-look-like-v0-5qxszpysfllb1.jpg?auto=webp&s=724320bc50ba24f80efb156f27256ad7bcce9eba)
Fair enough
Israel didn’t bar Guterres from entering the country. Israel Katz claims to have done so. Does he actually have the power to do so in his role as FM?
(This is not a comment on Guterres.)
A reminder that both [Ban Ki-Moon](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/ban-kimoon-united-nations-disproportionate-israel-focus-resolutions-palestinians-human-rights-danny-danon-a7481961.html) and [Kofi Annan](https://www.nytimes.com/1999/12/13/world/annan-calls-for-better-treatment-of-israel-at-united-nations.html), the last two UN secretary generals have repeatedly stated themselves that the UN is biased against Israel, mostly after leaving office. Guterres is a pure product of that 20-year running obsession with condemning Israel.
They should issue a warrant for his arrest on terrorism charges.
UN has been corrupted and is pretty much useless.