Die russische selbstfahrende Artillerie verschwindet allmählich vom Schlachtfeld. Der OSINT-Forscher Ben analysierte Statistiken über Angriffe der ukrainischen Streitkräfte auf Artillerieanlagen der russischen Streitkräfte und stellte fest, dass der Anteil der selbstfahrenden Artillerie im August 2023 41,86 % betrug, während er im September 2024 auf 15,22 % gesunken war. Ben stellt fest, dass unter den selbstfahrenden Waffen regelmäßig nur eine selbstfahrende Waffe auftaucht – 2S19 "Msta-S". Darüber hinaus ist es das einzige, das noch in Serie produziert wird.
@yigal_levin
https://i.redd.it/s1mhz75sy4sd1.jpeg
16 Comments
A large proportion of the Russian self-propelled artillery pieces that were eliminated were destroyed or damaged by FPV drones because they are easier to spot due to their size together with the vehicle. Initiatives such as Wild Hornets are one of those that help to provide Ukrainian brigades with FPV drones and consequently to reduce the power of the Russian artillery. If you would like to help with this goal, consider donating to [Wild Hornets](https://dykishershni.com/en.html)
Statistics just show that numbers of SPG are roughly static while towed rose significantly.
Don’t worry; they’ll start trotting out the horse-drawn stuff any minute now!
is there a place that this kind of table is showing all of russian casualities (not only artillery but other weapons and human) for the whole period of war?
Russians were always so proud of their self propelled artillery machines. 🙂
The self propelled artillery machines don’t have reactive armor blocks. One shaped charge delivered by a drone can blow it off.
Good, back to horse-drawn darts!
Well but the number of towed one AS WELL AS the total combined number were increasing
Based on the latter I rather consider Russia‘s firepower to have INCREASED
Also worth noting is that among towed artillery, the proportion of 152mm is down from 56% to just below 30%.
However – the data is incomplete to say the least. It hardly contains 2 days of losses per month, so the composition may not reflect reality. OSINT just isn’t a great source with regard to artillery losses.
Also, it looks like their getting low on tanks aswell when you compare the destroyed table from like a year ago till now
Seems like good news.
Hey guys, i just follow this development casually in the war. Can someone briefly tell me what i can take away from this ? I understand less artilleri= less bombardement and that the only good Russian is a dead one. But what is the impact that less self propelled arty will have on the frontline ? Thank you in advance if you respond 🙂
I bet the *barrels* will be the ultimate deciding factor (i.e. not the chassis type). There was an article that ruZZia no longer has the foundries to make that super-tough barrel-grade steel (there was no need because they inherited tens of 1000s from Soviets), and they will run out of barrels (which can only take several 1000s of shots before becoming unsuitable) before running out of chassis
At what point though does this amount to a decisive limitation on the Russians to where they are unable to stop a Ukrainian counterattack and subsequently cede territory? I love seeing material losses ramp up each month but it seems like they can just keep filling the gap with meat soldiers.
And sone people don’t understand Russia is near done, just because they keep attacking. It’s to look powerful, the facts show Ukraine’s victory is guaranteed as long as we continue to give them what they need. And let’s expand their options November 6th
While many have been visibly destroyed, many were also pulled off for maintenance and barrel replacements. NK gave millions of artillery shells. Russia may be comfortable with towed artillery while they have steady advances. We could easily see more SPGs coming back to the front in a few months