Close Menu
    Politics

    Sonderermittler drängt auf Veröffentlichung wichtiger Akten im Fall Trump vom 6. Januar


    Sonderermittler drängt auf Veröffentlichung wichtiger Akten im Fall Trump vom 6. Januar

    https://abcnews.go.com/US/special-counsel-pushing-public-release-key-filing-trumps/story?id=114294940

    View 32 Comments

    32 Comments

    2. YesterShill on

      “A response from the prosecutors is due on Oct 10, meaning the material could possibly become public in mid-October.”

      Surprise!

    3. Simmery on

      Can its release be appealed to the Supreme Court? If so, we’re not seeing it any time soon, if ever. 

    5. TintedApostle on

      I would wonder why a defendant wouldn’t want evidence in the public eye especially when they have been professing to be totally innocent.

    7. diabolis_avocado on

      It won’t move the needle on the election:

      His voters won’t care.

      Harris voters will still vote for her, just harder.

      The “undecideds” will remain low information voters who will either miss it entirely or be too busy to digest it.

      The media won’t report it properly because it won’t bump ad revenue.

    9. Independent-Bug-9352 on

      I’m betting on DNA evidence from the Ketchup stains on the walls.

      *Cue 48 Hours ominous music*.

    11. danarexasaurus on

      I haven’t seen anyone speculating on what this may actually be. I wanna hear your most insane theories!

    12. Potential_Degree7089 on

      Interesting how we expect key filings to reveal the “truth,” yet we’ve seen over and over that public opinion is shaped less by facts and more by what people want to hear. If transparency is the answer, why does it seem like every big revelation only deepens divisions?

    14. autotldr on

      This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://abcnews.go.com/US/special-counsel-pushing-public-release-key-filing-trumps/story?id=114294940) reduced by 67%. (I’m a bot)
      *****
      > A day after filing a sealed brief seeking to justify his superseding indictment against Donald Trump, special counsel Jack Smith is pushing to file a public version of the brief that includes "Substantive" summaries of what investigators learned from witnesses in the former president's federal election interference case.

      > If permitted by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, the public filing could shed new light on the government's sweeping case against Trump by making public the summaries of information obtained from witness interviews, grand jury testimony, and search warrants.

      > In July, the Supreme Court ruled in blockbuster decision that Trump is entitled to immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts undertaken while in office – effectively sending the case back to Chutkan to sort out which charges against Trump can stand.

      *****
      [**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/1fqw49p/special_counsel_pushing_for_public_release_of_key/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ “Version 2.02, ~694453 tl;drs so far.”) | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr “PM’s and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome.”) | *Top* *keywords*: **file**^#1 **Trump**^#2 **public**^#3 **case**^#4 **brief**^#5

    15. sachiprecious on

      Good, I’m glad he wants the public to see it. The public deserves to know. Okay sure, the Trump supporters will call it fake news. But in this close election, even if only a few people change their minds and decide not to vote for Trump, that may be enough.

    16. Scoracek9 on

      This will just be delayed until after the election like everything else

    18. moreesq on

      A smart Jack Smith knows that if Trump is elected, Smith’s efforts will end and all evidence buried. Thus, like the January 6 investigation committee, put all the evidence that he can before the public to protect against that possibility. Let’s hope that judge chutkan agrees with him.

    19. AntoniaFauci on

      > I’m betting on DNA evidence from the Ketchup stains on the walls.
      Cue 48 Hours ominous music

      Is “Frenetic Cello Player” considered to be a “black job”?

    21. ioncloud9 on

      It should definitely be in the public interest to know this information when the defendant is actively running for the highest office in the land.

    22. Sidwill on

      We all know what the fuckwad did it’s just that his supporters just don’t care

    23. spurs126 on

      Anyone else pessimistic that Trump won’t lose any voters no matter how bad this is? 

    25. Muchwanted on

      “Undecided voters do not care about January 6th.”

      I’ve heard this dozens of times now. I still struggle to understand why TF not. So, the people who matter will not GAF about this report. 

    27. hackingdreams on

      If you’re wondering why FPOTUS is on a “PROSECUTE MY ENEMIES” spree today, here’s your answer.

    28. MyCleverNewName on

      I think the American people have a right to know who is asking for their vote

    29. pessimistix on

      If Judge Tanya Chutkan approves the request, Can the Trump team ask the Supreme Court to step in, there by delaying the release of the evidence? I am tired of false hopes.

    30. LandoDaph on

      This dude should be investigated for treason, and definitely not allowed to run until he’s cleared of any wrongdoing

    31. HowtoCrackanegg on

      Probably something like Donald trump uses a thick paste of doritos and orange juice to keep his complexion

    32. Significant-Self5907 on

      Will it be one more dot that connects Dump directly to Putin’s sphincter?

    Leave A Reply