Vorsitzender des NATO-Ausschusses: Ukraine hat triftige militärische Gründe, tiefer in Russland einzudringen

https://www.rferl.org/a/nato-bauer-rehka-military-committee-conference-prague/33120174.html

18 Comments

  1. MotheroftheworldII on

    By not allowing Ukraine to strike deeper into Russia are we not prolonging this war for Ukraine. The government of Ukraine did not start this war Russia is the invader here and they should feel the pain they have inflicted on the Ukrainian people.

    Russia has targeted civilian infrastructure, power plants, hospitals, schools, and apartment buildings, none of which are military targets.

    All of the sanctions have not stopped Putin and his invasion of Ukraine so let the Ukrainian military strike back and work without the political restraints and win the war against Russia.

  2. ffdfawtreteraffds on

    World leader A says: it’s the right thing to do.

    World leader B says: sure, use my missiles for deep strikes.

    World leader C says: I’m talking to World Leaders D, E, and F and will decide later.

    World leader G says: no, not with my missiles.

    World leader H says: this won’t make a difference and we have a better idea.

    World leader Z says: my country is being destroyed and my people murdered while my friends find excuses not to help me. Why is this happening?

  3. Make this war as personal as a punch in the face for more Russians who thought this was all abstract and happening a long way off. Hell yeah!

  4. FakeChowNumNum1 on

    Sure it may be good for the planet, but does that stance help me get re-elected next year?

  5. I hope everyone here knows there are many Russians from the GRU sitting around downvoting all the comments that are positive about striking deeper into Russia.
    Putin is terrified of this because it will expose how unprepared his country is and we’ll begin to turn opinion against him. Propaganda only works when you don’t see the war in your front yard.

  6. SignifigantZebra on

    Cool Well NATO better come up with some weapons to give from someone else’s stockpike other than America’s, because they aren’t interested in Ukraine winning this war, Just not losing.

    and Russia is ramping up production to a point that Western weapons cannot tip the balance anymore. which ends up being a slow and drawn out, net loss.

  7. ceccerececce on

    Anyone else tired of this song and dance? Either allow the use of western weapons or shut up about it. Pussying around while repeating that they are totally justified in wanting to do so is such bad optics.

  8. Apples_and_Overtones on

    Lots of “saying,” and not a whole lot of doing about it.

  9. Criminoboy on

    The title is misleading. What is being debated is not UKRAINE striking deeper into NATO.

    What is being proposed is using NATO countries’ missiles, guided by NATO countries’ satellites, with NATO countries’ decoys and guidance data being programmed, on the ground by NATO personnel.

    And what those proposing this are betting on, is that Russia WILL NOT react in exactly the same way that the US would react, when another nation state is attacking them. Namely, by attacking the export origin of those missiles.

    Those who claim that Russia ‘doesn’t have the balls’ are suuure betting big!

    But beware, this could mark the first time in history a major war has started when one side underestimated their enemy.

  10. FeelingAd752 on

    NATO stands for NO ACTION, TALK ONLY.
    IF NATO wanted so bad to strike Russia, please do so now, why wait wait. Since Europeans unions like war so much, joints forces and march into Moscow to overthrow Putin. No balls don’t use saliva as your weapons. Splitting siliva no use. Lousy

  11. swagonflyyyy on

    I feel like countries that don’t approve the airstrike right away are just waiting for the right time to strike.

    To us it looks like that time is now but I believe part of the West doesn’t think so. Maybe they’re waiting until after the US elections? Maybe Zelenskyy is waiting for certain battlefield conditions to be met and those other countries are on board?

    I can’t speak for those countries but something tells me they see a much juicier target down the road and then they’ll strike. Its just worries me that Trump might win re-election so if that was the case then it makes me wonder what exactly they’re waiting on to launch the misssiles…

  12. Royal-Novel355 on

    Problem is ukraine dosen’t have the ability to strike deep in russia…if any strikes happen it’s from NATO and US…and this will lead to Nuke war and end of humanity.

  13. GoblinKing5817 on

    God damn, this is how WW3 starts. Long range missiles from the west that Ukraine sends into Russia. These escalations are not the answer for peace.

  14. Typically getting invaded is more than enough grounds for a counterattack/invasion.

Leave A Reply